Skip to content

Align the naming note with the required public messaging - #63

Merged
blocksifrdev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/naming-alignment
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

blocksifrdev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/naming-alignment

Conversation

@blocksifrdev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The repo carried three product names at once:

  • docs/ttp-vs-rap-vs-scim-re.md: "the primary commercial product name for production enforcement is Execution Exchange"
  • Issue #47 ("Required public messaging"): product is BlockSiFr Control, category Execution Control Infrastructure, launch January 6 2027, early access open now
  • Neither BlockSiFr Control, Execution Control Infrastructure nor Consequence Intelligence appeared anywhere in the repository

#47 is the most recent and most explicit statement of intent, so the note follows it, and places TTP where that issue places it: the open protocol-level trust mechanic beneath the commercial product.

Execution Exchange is kept as the enforcement component name rather than retired — docs/architecture.md uses it that way and docs/TRADEMARKS.md lists it as a live trademark, so calling it legacy would have replaced one contradiction with another. Only FrontDesk is marked legacy.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The repository carried three product names at once. docs/ttp-vs-rap-vs-scim-re.md
said the primary commercial product is Execution Exchange; issue #47
("Required public messaging") says the product is BlockSiFr Control in the
Execution Control Infrastructure category, launching January 6 2027 with
early access open now. Neither BlockSiFr Control, Execution Control
Infrastructure nor Consequence Intelligence appeared anywhere in the repo.

#47 is the most recent and most explicit statement of intent, so the note
now follows it, and places TTP where that issue places it: the open
protocol-level trust mechanic beneath the commercial product.

Execution Exchange is kept as the enforcement component name rather than
retired — docs/architecture.md uses it that way and docs/TRADEMARKS.md
lists it as a live trademark, so calling it legacy would have replaced one
contradiction with another. Only FrontDesk is marked legacy.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@blocksifrdev
blocksifrdev merged commit 8fcb4c6 into main Sep 15, 2026
1 check passed
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@blocksifrdev
blocksifrdev deleted the docs/naming-alignment branch September 15, 2026 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant