Quick summary
Posts without a featured image federate with the site icon in the icon property. Misskey renders that as an extra low-resolution image on the post, so the site logo shows up under every post that has no image of its own.
Reported here: https://wordpress.org/support/topic/misskey-posts-include-additional-lo-res-images/
An example, a Note with an empty attachment array but an icon:
{
"type": "Note",
"attachment": [],
"icon": {
"type": "Image",
"mediaType": "image/jpeg",
"url": "https://dorkboy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/cropped-cropped-Robot-3-1-150x150.jpg"
}
}
Why it happens
Nothing asks for an icon on a Note. Transformer\Base::to_object() walks every property the object supports and calls the matching getter if the transformer has one:
$getter = 'get_' . $var;
if ( \method_exists( $this, $getter ) ) {
$value = \call_user_func( array( $this, $getter ) );
Base_Object has an icon property and Transformer\Post has get_icon(), so every post gets one. get_icon() uses the featured image and falls back to get_option( 'site_icon' ) at thumbnail size, which is where the 150x150 crop comes from.
Mastodon ignores icon on a Note, Misskey shows it, and both are defensible: AS2 describes icon as a small image representing the object.
get_icon() has a second, wanted use as the poster fallback for video attachments in Transformer\Base, so the method should stay either way.
Options
- Drop the
site_icon fallback from Transformer\Post::get_icon(). No featured image, no icon. Fixes the report and keeps a real thumbnail where there is one.
- Stop mapping
icon onto the object and keep get_icon() only for the video poster. A Note then never carries icon, on the grounds that attachment already carries the images.
- Leave it. It is spec-legal and only one implementation surfaces it.
Option 1 looks like the smallest fix that addresses what was reported, since the complaint is specifically about the site logo appearing on posts that have no image. Option 2 is the stronger argument if we think a post should not advertise an icon at all.
Site owner impact
Fewer than 20% of the total website/platform users
Severity
Low
Quick summary
Posts without a featured image federate with the site icon in the
iconproperty. Misskey renders that as an extra low-resolution image on the post, so the site logo shows up under every post that has no image of its own.Reported here: https://wordpress.org/support/topic/misskey-posts-include-additional-lo-res-images/
An example, a
Notewith an emptyattachmentarray but anicon:{ "type": "Note", "attachment": [], "icon": { "type": "Image", "mediaType": "image/jpeg", "url": "https://dorkboy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/cropped-cropped-Robot-3-1-150x150.jpg" } }Why it happens
Nothing asks for an icon on a
Note.Transformer\Base::to_object()walks every property the object supports and calls the matching getter if the transformer has one:Base_Objecthas aniconproperty andTransformer\Posthasget_icon(), so every post gets one.get_icon()uses the featured image and falls back toget_option( 'site_icon' )at thumbnail size, which is where the 150x150 crop comes from.Mastodon ignores
iconon aNote, Misskey shows it, and both are defensible: AS2 describesiconas a small image representing the object.get_icon()has a second, wanted use as the poster fallback for video attachments inTransformer\Base, so the method should stay either way.Options
site_iconfallback fromTransformer\Post::get_icon(). No featured image, no icon. Fixes the report and keeps a real thumbnail where there is one.icononto the object and keepget_icon()only for the video poster. ANotethen never carriesicon, on the grounds thatattachmentalready carries the images.Option 1 looks like the smallest fix that addresses what was reported, since the complaint is specifically about the site logo appearing on posts that have no image. Option 2 is the stronger argument if we think a post should not advertise an icon at all.
Site owner impact
Fewer than 20% of the total website/platform users
Severity
Low