You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Grooming the wordings/microcopy for the standing prompts #1505
Groom the wording/microcopy of the standing-prompt confirmation flow — the text a person sees when codeaf proposes a standing rule, and the copy around it.
Scope
The confirmation buttons, e.g. "Keep this rule" / "Don't keep it", and the question line that introduces them.
Surrounding copy: what the card says about scope, cadence, cost and what the rule will do when it fires, plus any success/error/refusal responses after the choice.
Tone and consistency: matches the rest of the v3 chat surface; no jargon; tells the person exactly what saying yes binds.
Acceptance
Review the current strings, propose tighter wording where a phrase costs a moment to parse, and keep labels/buttons short and unambiguous.
Wording stays consistent with existing v3 surface copy.
—
Drafted with CodeAF · reviewed and owned by the author
The standing-prompt wording was revised by #1520, included in merged #1627 (ac84606f4429), and the standing confirmation itself was subsequently retired by #1831 (966e2a788b11). Current automations use a different card, and saved rules use memory. Closing this grooming request as obsolete after those replacements; there is no remaining standing-prompt copy to groom.
Activity
santoshkumarradha commentedon Oct 23, 2026
Audited against current
dev(39fdbea6f73c).The standing-prompt wording was revised by #1520, included in merged #1627 (
ac84606f4429), and the standing confirmation itself was subsequently retired by #1831 (966e2a788b11). Current automations use a different card, and saved rules use memory. Closing this grooming request as obsolete after those replacements; there is no remaining standing-prompt copy to groom.