Skip to content

chore(flake): sync version + npmDepsHash [skip-flake-sync] - #30

Closed
jasonodoom wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bot/flake-sync-30222482532
Closed

chore(flake): sync version + npmDepsHash [skip-flake-sync]#30
jasonodoom wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bot/flake-sync-30222482532

Conversation

@jasonodoom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Auto-generated by flake-sync.yml. Merges automatically once CI passes.

  • version: 0.11.0 -> 0.11.0
  • npmDepsHash: sha256-Bw2AayHybNF9NJBcjm3cL6KgNz4cvF5WS/3esbJB1jQ= -> sha256-IbxMY+aZeS4KOv0kolu/n0pN7DUG9pR7Nt84fyF1A3M=

Auto-generated by .github/workflows/flake-sync.yml.
- version:     0.11.0 -> 0.11.0
- npmDepsHash: sha256-Bw2AayHybNF9NJBcjm3cL6KgNz4cvF5WS/3esbJB1jQ= -> sha256-IbxMY+aZeS4KOv0kolu/n0pN7DUG9pR7Nt84fyF1A3M=
@jasonodoom
jasonodoom enabled auto-merge (squash) July 26, 2026 22:07
@jasonodoom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded and closing. This proposes sha256-IbxMY+aZeS4KOv0kolu/n0pN7DUG9pR7Nt84fyF1A3M=, computed from the lockfile as it stood on 26 July. The conflict is because the line it edits no longer exists: #29 fixed the same drift minutes later, and #43 updated the hash again after last night's dependency patches.

Current main carries sha256-w4a+PeWnGNeLLfncGXKwuuLiziqBGlH7qNzR53IqiVc=, which is what prefetch-npm-deps package-lock.json computes for the lockfile on main today. Merging this would replace a correct hash with a stale one and break nix build.

Cause of the duplicates: seven queued pull requests merged between 22:00 and 22:06 UTC that day. Each push to main started a sync run, each correctly saw the same drift, and each opened its own pull request. The [skip-flake-sync] marker stopped the loop once #29 landed, so this was redundancy rather than a loop.

@jasonodoom jasonodoom closed this Aug 26, 2026
auto-merge was automatically disabled August 26, 2026 04:19

Pull request was closed

@jasonodoom
jasonodoom deleted the bot/flake-sync-30222482532 branch August 26, 2026 04:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant