Skip to content

[LEAN-6] Review pairings whose witnesses already specialize or refine #104

Open

Description

@docxology

Scope ID: LEAN-6. Size: Minor. Scoped on 2026-10-08 in SCOPE-2026-10-08.md; acceptance remains open.

Owner: formalism relations.

Dependencies: Independent

Work

Seven pairing witnesses are named specializes/refines/extends/bounds (e.g. fep089_…_specializes_fep006, fep092_…_specializes_fep032). Re-tag genuine instantiations as formal; keep pairings whose rationale says conventions are not identified.

Acceptance

At least 22 formal edges, each with a review note naming the consumed endpoint theorem.

Failure controls and claim boundary

A pairing is not an implication; re-tag only on review.

Canonical references

Closure requires actual exact-source commands, results and retained receipts, with independent review where specified. Remove its open TODO row only after acceptance; retain delivery facts in changelog/history. Size describes implementation scope, not a semantic-version promise.

Activity

  1. docxology commented on Oct 9, 2026

    @docxology
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Status update (2026-10-09). Review delivered in #159 (via #164). None of the seven witnesses qualifies for re-tagging: each conjoins two independently proved endpoint theorems, and neither is derived from the other. The review table is in docs/relations-endpoint-adjudication.md. Five rationales overstate the link, and the tightened wording is recorded there as proposed. Released relation rows are digest-sealed (tests/test_formalism_catalogue_155.py), so applying it needs a reviewed seal delta. Remaining for closure: decide on the five proposed rationale rewrites and record them as reviewed edge deltas.

  2. docxology commented on Oct 11, 2026

    @docxology
    CollaboratorAuthor

    The relations file has 24 formal edges, which meets the count. All seven specializes/refines pairings were kept, per docs/relations-endpoint-adjudication.md. Still open: only 5 of the 24 rationales name their consumed endpoint theorem, and the five proposed rewrites live only in the adjudication doc. Applying them is a reviewed seal delta. The TODO.md row is narrowed in #171 to the remaining clause.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions