Update README title to include 'test'

[777genius]

Summary

• what changed
• why it changed

Verification

• go test ./...
• make vet
• make generated-check
• added or updated focused tests

Release Impact

• no public contract change
• docs updated when needed
• release-sensitive paths reviewed

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@777genius has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 53 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f4e06bc6-c2da-487f-ade7-ae37366c4a1b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e003223 and 1104a72.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch 777genius-patch-1

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[review-router-ai]

🤖 ReviewRouter Progress

Step	Status	Details
Build code graph	✅ Done
LLM review (batched)	✅ Done
Static analysis & rules	✅ Done
Synthesize & report	✅ Done

[review-router-ai]

ReviewRouter

0 Critical • 0 Major • 0 Minor

Summary

LLM review skipped: no healthy providers were available. Static checks did not find issues.

Review Scope

Scope	Count
Total PR files	1
Files considered by reviewer	0
Full diff in prompt	0
Compacted in prompt	0
Metadata-only or trimmed	0
Skipped before LLM review	1
Codex agentic context	Enabled for Codex providers
Review mode	full

Files not shown as full diffs in the primary prompt:

• README.md - skipped - trivial or low-signal file excluded before LLM review

Codex providers with agentic context can inspect related files read-only during review. This section is still shown so a "no findings" result on a large PR is auditable.

All Clear!

LLM analysis skipped because no providers were healthy.

Performance Metrics

Metric	Value
Duration	0.76s
Billing	Not reported
Providers	0/0

---

_{0.8s • Powered by ReviewRouter}