Hello Matheus,
I've been using mitograph to analyze yeast mitochondria. It's been working quite well at low res (0.167um _xy) but once the xy resolution goes below a certain limit, mitograph becomes unreliable. Below is some mitograph output from the mitos of two cells. The first two images are from a low res image, the skeleton looks nice and smooth and the nodes look appropriately placed at mito ends and junctions. The second two images are from a much higher resolution image; now the skeleton output is much more jagged and way too many nodes are assigned. This completely ruins the quantification.
Things I've tried (on the input as I don't know enough C++ to get under the hood of mitograph):
zoom (from scipy)- significantly helped the jaggedness but changes geometry so I'm not a fan
smoothing, gaussian or median filters in imageJ -- no effect
appreciate any advice! let me know if I can provide any more information. Thanks!




Hello Matheus,
I've been using mitograph to analyze yeast mitochondria. It's been working quite well at low res (0.167um _xy) but once the xy resolution goes below a certain limit, mitograph becomes unreliable. Below is some mitograph output from the mitos of two cells. The first two images are from a low res image, the skeleton looks nice and smooth and the nodes look appropriately placed at mito ends and junctions. The second two images are from a much higher resolution image; now the skeleton output is much more jagged and way too many nodes are assigned. This completely ruins the quantification.
Things I've tried (on the input as I don't know enough C++ to get under the hood of mitograph):
zoom (from scipy)- significantly helped the jaggedness but changes geometry so I'm not a fan
smoothing, gaussian or median filters in imageJ -- no effect
appreciate any advice! let me know if I can provide any more information. Thanks!