You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
fix(seeder): example chats read correctly under today's chat rules
Wakes are wake-shaped (banner renders), no prose points at tool rows
that no longer render, footer-era phrasing removed, the four-wake
variation matrix became one coherent story, and tests now enforce all
of it (wake ids parse via the real WakeBanner, removed-UI phrases are
banned).
`Watching \`${w.failedRunId}\` — I'll check every minute for up to 2 hours and tell you the moment it settles, whichever way it goes. I only speak once per watch, so it won't repeat itself.`
`**The retry finished.** \`${w.failedRunId}\` completed successfully 4 minutes ago, on attempt 2 — the provider accepted the request once the delay pushed it out of the rate-limit window.
596
615
597
-
I've stopped watching it. The other runs from the same burst are still queued behind the concurrency limit; ask me if you want them watched too.`
616
+
That's this watch done. The rest of the ${w.firstFailureClock} burst is still queued behind \`${w.queue}\`'s concurrency limit, and the rate-limit error is worth watching for the next 12 hours in case the fix didn't take — say the word for either.`
`Two things you might want next: the remaining runs from the ${w.firstFailureClock} burst are still queued behind \`${w.queue}\`'s concurrency limit, and the rate-limit error itself is worth a watch for the next 12 hours in case the fix didn't take. Say the word for either.`
604
-
),
605
-
]),
606
620
],
607
621
});
608
622
609
623
chats.push({
610
-
slug: "watch-expiry-and-cancel",
611
-
title: "Watch for that error recurring",
624
+
slug: "watch-fired-and-expired",
625
+
title: "Watch the error and the backlog",
612
626
minutesAgo: 40,
613
627
messages: [
628
+
user(
629
+
"watch-end",
630
+
`Watch two things for me: that 429 coming back, and \`${w.backlogQueue}\` draining.`
631
+
),
614
632
assistant("watch-end",[
615
633
text(
616
-
`Four watches from this conversation have finished, and each one said so exactly once — below, in the order they spoke.`
634
+
`Both armed. The error watch covers fingerprint \`${w.errorFingerprint}\` on \`${w.taskId}\` for the next 12 hours; the backlog watch covers \`${w.backlogQueue}\` for 6. Each one speaks once — when its condition is met, or when its window runs out with nothing to report.`
`**I've stopped watching \`${w.backlogQueue}\`.** The 6-hour window is up and the backlog never fully drained — it's down from ${w.pending.toLocaleString("en-US")} to 610 pending, so it's clearing, just slower than the window I was given.
639
+
`**The 429 is back.** \`${w.taskId}\` failed with the same fingerprint 9 minutes ago, so the retry change hasn't taken — the attempts are still landing inside one rate-limit window.
622
640
623
-
Ask again if you want another 6 hours.`
641
+
That's the error watch spent. Cap \`${w.queue}\` at 20 concurrency if you want the burst to stop before the next deploy.`
`**I've stopped watching prod's health, but I couldn't verify the condition at expiry.** The health data was unavailable on my last few checks, so I can't tell you whether prod recovered — only that I never saw it recover.
648
+
`**Six hours are up and \`${w.backlogQueue}\` never fully drained.** It's down from ${w.pending.toLocaleString(
649
+
"en-US"
650
+
)} to 610 pending, so it is clearing — just slower than the window I was given, which is why I have no answer rather than bad news.
629
651
630
-
Re-run the health report to get a current answer.`
@@ -650,7 +671,7 @@ Re-run the health report to get a current answer.`
650
671
]),
651
672
assistant("rep-h",[
652
673
text(
653
-
"Nothing needs you. Every reading is inside the band you've run at for the past week, and telemetry is seconds behind, so this is a current picture rather than a stale one."
674
+
"Every reading is inside the band you've run at for the past week, and telemetry is seconds behind, so this is a current picture rather than a stale one. The one thing worth knowing: this window is quiet because the arrival rate is quiet — it is not proof the concurrency limit is high enough for a busy hour."
654
675
),
655
676
]),
656
677
],
@@ -673,8 +694,9 @@ Re-run the health report to get a current answer.`
673
694
text(
674
695
`Your code is fine — ${w.failureRatePct}% of runs failed and p95 duration hasn't moved. You've been pinned at the environment's concurrency ceiling of ${w.envConcurrencyLimit} for ${w.pinnedMinutes} of the last 60 minutes, ${w.pending.toLocaleString("en-US")} runs are pending, and \`${w.queue}\` accounts for ${Math.round(
675
696
w.worstQueueShare*100
676
-
)}% of them. Raising the limit clears it now; doing nothing clears it in about ${w.drainMinutes} minutes, once the ${w.triggeredPerMin.toLocaleString("en-US")}-a-minute arrival spike drops back under the ${w.donePerMin.toLocaleString("en-US")}a minute you're completing.`
697
+
)}% of them — so this is one queue's spike, not the whole environment misbehaving. Arrivals are ${w.triggeredPerMin.toLocaleString("en-US")} a minute against the ${w.donePerMin.toLocaleString("en-US")} you're completing, and that gap is already narrowing. The oldest thing still waiting is \`${w.waitingRunId}\`, if you want to see what a queued run looks like from the inside.`
@@ -693,7 +715,7 @@ Re-run the health report to get a current answer.`
693
715
694
716
- \`maxAttempts\` counts the *first* attempt, so \`3\` means one try plus two retries.
695
717
- The delay is \`minTimeoutInMs * factor^(attempt - 1)\`, capped at \`maxTimeoutInMs\`.
696
-
- \`randomize: true\` adds jitter, which is what stops a whole batch retrying in lockstep — the thing that bit \`${w.taskId}\` above.`
718
+
- \`randomize: true\` adds jitter, which is what stops a whole batch retrying in lockstep — the thing that bit \`${w.taskId}\` on \`${w.queue}\` this morning.`
@@ -705,13 +727,13 @@ Re-run the health report to get a current answer.`
705
727
706
728
chats.push({
707
729
slug: "base-resumed",
708
-
title: "Queue health over time",
730
+
title: "Did this happen earlier today too?",
709
731
minutesAgo: 21,
710
732
messages: [
711
733
user("res","Did this happen earlier today too?"),
712
734
assistant("res",[
713
735
text(
714
-
`Yes — same error, same task, earlier in the same burst. \`${w.taskId}\` hit the same rate limit at ${w.firstFailureClock} and it was diagnosed then too; the card below is that diagnosis, replayed from this conversation rather than re-run. The retry config hasn't changed since, which is why it came back.`
736
+
`Yes — same error, same task, earlier in the same burst. \`${w.taskId}\` hit the same rate limit at ${w.firstFailureClock} and I diagnosed it then; both diagnoses are here — this run's, and \`${w.priorRunId}\` from the start of the burst. The retry config hasn't changed since, which is why it came back.`
715
737
),
716
738
// Revisions 0 and 1 of one diagnosis (the renderer collapses to the
717
739
// highest revision) plus one envelope-less block from an older transcript.
@@ -720,7 +742,7 @@ Re-run the health report to get a current answer.`
720
742
assistant("res",[
721
743
renderView([failuresChart]),
722
744
text(
723
-
"The chart block runs live against your current environment every time this transcript is opened."
745
+
`The chart is live, so it answers the same question for whatever has happened since: two clusters today, both on \`${w.taskId}\`, nothing on the other senders.`
0 commit comments