Skip to content

osm_type definition for areas ? #6

@etienneJr

Description

@etienneJr

Hi again!
Can you explain to me why, in both backend, the osm_type is w for ways and a for relations ? I was expecting a for both, and I can't find the explanation elsewhere.
Thanks!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions