Skip to content

Compatibility reports wanted: tell us how the setup script ran on your machine #7

Description

@saty-a

All three platforms are implemented now. The most useful five-minute contribution: run the script for your platform and say what happened.

Please open a compatibility report (or comment here) with:

  • OS version and architecture (Windows: winver and $PSVersionTable.PSVersion)
  • Whether the machine was clean, or already had Flutter / Android Studio / a JDK
  • Whether you were on a corporate network, proxy or VPN
  • The final summary table, and the exit code
  • Anything that needed a manual fix afterwards

Successful runs are as valuable as failures — they are what turns "should work" into "known to work". For failures, attach the log from <install root>/logs/ (skim it first; it contains your username, machine name and full paths).

Specifically wanted, because I could not test these

  • Intel macOSmacos/setup.sh was verified on Apple Silicon only.
  • A real x86_64 Linux machinelinux/setup.sh was verified in an emulated container, which is not the same as bare metal.
  • Distros beyond Ubuntu and Fedora — Arch, openSUSE and Alpine package-name hints are reasoned from /etc/os-release, not verified.
  • Windows behind TLS inspection (Zscaler/Netskope-style) — the hardest path to verify alone, and the one most likely still wrong.

Already verified: Windows 10/11, macOS 15 on Apple Silicon, Ubuntu 24.04 x86_64 (container).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    compat-reportReport of a run on a specific machine/Windows buildgood first issueGood for newcomershelp wantedExtra attention is needed

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions