What it does
Where res is a Result,
while let Some(a) = res.ok() {should be rewritten as
This could either be an enhancement to if_let_some_result or have a new name like while_let_some_result.
SEE ALSO: #7586 where previously clippy suggested an incorrect fix (changing while to if). In that thread, @camsteffen suggested creating a new issue for this.
Categories (optional)
What is the advantage of the recommended code over the original code
Conciseness etc.
It maintains consistency with the existent if_let_some_result and has the same advantages, except now for while loops too.
Drawbacks
None.
Example
struct Wat {
counter: i32,
}
impl Wat {
fn next(&mut self) -> Result<i32, &str> {
self.counter += 1;
if self.counter < 5 {
Ok(self.counter)
} else {
Err("Oh no")
}
}
}
fn main() {
let mut wat = Wat { counter: 0 };
while let Some(a) = wat.next().ok() { // <---- here
dbg!(&a);
}
}Could be written as:
while let Ok(a) = wat.next() {
What it does
Where
resis aResult,should be rewritten as
This could either be an enhancement to
if_let_some_resultor have a new name likewhile_let_some_result.SEE ALSO: #7586 where previously clippy suggested an incorrect fix (changing while to if). In that thread, @camsteffen suggested creating a new issue for this.
Categories (optional)
styleWhat is the advantage of the recommended code over the original code
Conciseness etc.
It maintains consistency with the existent
if_let_some_resultand has the same advantages, except now for while loops too.Drawbacks
None.
Example
Could be written as: