Replies: 3 comments
-
|
Created planner discussion: https://github.com/CrossTerra/monorepo/discussions/2532 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Curious about the methodology here. The breakdown page shows the score components but it's not super clear what's actually being measured under each one, file structure, doc coverage, presence of llms.txt or AGENTS.md, machine-readable manifests? A couple things that usually help maintainers decide on adopting a third-party badge: a public methodology doc with criteria and weights, some guarantee the badge URL and image format stay stable long term, and a way to see how the score evolves when the repo changes. If those aren't documented yet, requests like this tend to get parked. For openai/codex specifically you'd probably get more traction filing this as an issue with the breakdown attached, since maintainers don't usually treat Discussions as a queue for repo changes. One more thing, codex is itself the agent, not really a target codebase for one. Scoring it for "agent friendliness" feels a bit recursive. Might make sense to filter out AI coding tools from your index, or put them in a separate category, since the criteria probably don't translate cleanly. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for this @Gecko51! You can read more about the methodology of how we are deriving the score here - https://www.agentfriendlycode.com/methodology And, I will keep in mind of opening an issue rather than a discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello team,
I am Himanshu.
I am working on a side project that scores repos for agent friendliness.
codexhas an overall 65.5 score.Would it be possible to add a badge for it in the README?
You can use this -
The Badge
Breakdown of the score
https://www.agentfriendlycode.com/repo/118
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions