Establish independent maintainer and IPI editor teams

[ipicoinrepo]

Problem

IPI still depends on a bootstrap owner account and cannot yet require an independent approving review on every repository without risking deadlock.

Outcome

Create a public, evidence-based path from bootstrap control to independent maintenance.

Acceptance criteria

• define eligibility, conflicts of interest, inactivity, removal, and recovery for maintainers and IPI editors
• nominate at least two active reviewers whose independence and responsibilities are public
• map code ownership for active repositories without granting unnecessary organization-wide access
• document how an outside contributor can earn review and maintenance responsibility
• enable at least one required approving review after the reviewer pool is demonstrably sufficient
• record the decision through the governance and IPI processes

No individual should be appointed only to satisfy a number. The team must be able to review and operate the relevant project from public information.