You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A DX comparison with Blume highlights a useful split:
Blume has the stronger docs-site common path: filesystem-first navigation, very small configuration, an integrated CLI lifecycle, doctor, and skill descriptions that explicitly trigger for Markdown/MDX authoring.
Leadtype has the stronger docs supply-chain and agent-consumption model: framework-independent content primitives, package-bundled version-matched docs, multi-repo acquisition and source ownership, rich generated agent surfaces, config-aware linting, scoring, and structured CLI output.
The goal is to take the best DX lessons from Blume without turning Leadtype into a rendered theme/framework or hiding the controls needed by c15t-scale multi-repo documentation.
Principles
The common path should be small and progressive; advanced controls remain available.
Existing configs keep working while one canonical format becomes the documented path.
Human docs and agent artifacts must consume one resolved content/navigation graph.
Every important operation should be explainable to both humans and agents.
Leadtype continues to own the content pipeline and integration primitives, not rendered UI.
Context
A DX comparison with Blume highlights a useful split:
doctor, and skill descriptions that explicitly trigger for Markdown/MDX authoring.The goal is to take the best DX lessons from Blume without turning Leadtype into a rendered theme/framework or hiding the controls needed by c15t-scale multi-repo documentation.
Principles
Workstreams
Immediate agent-authoring DX
Configuration and defaults
Runtime parity and explainability
leadtype doctorto explain resolved config and project healthLarge-site authoring
Suggested sequencing
Success criteria