Motivation
Currently, when you get a signal in a Pipeline, it just references that signal and that's it. But what about LogicStructures? If you access an element of a LogicStructure in additional to the LogicStructure itself, they are treated as separate signals. That's kind of confusing and unintuitive.
Desired solution
Make Pipeline more LogicStructure-aware, treating a get on an element of a LogicStructure the same as getting the LogicStructure then accessing its element.
Alternatives considered
No response
Additional details
No response
Motivation
Currently, when you
geta signal in aPipeline, it just references that signal and that's it. But what aboutLogicStructures? If you access an element of aLogicStructurein additional to theLogicStructureitself, they are treated as separate signals. That's kind of confusing and unintuitive.Desired solution
Make
PipelinemoreLogicStructure-aware, treating ageton an element of aLogicStructurethe same as getting theLogicStructurethen accessing its element.Alternatives considered
No response
Additional details
No response