Workflow Health — 2026-06-01
Executive read: Strong acceptance rate (91%) with 10 pending items across 6 workflows and 5 discussion items with uncertain status — underdefined evaluation for daily reporting workflows needs attention.
| Workflow |
Status |
Lifecycle health |
References |
| Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer |
🟨🟨🟨🟩 |
🟡 in flight |
🟨 run · 🟨 run · 🟨 run · 🟩 #36153 |
| PR Sous Chef |
🟨🟨🟩🟨🟩🟩 |
🟡 in flight |
🟨 comment · 🟨 comment · 🟩 comment · 🟨 comment · 🟩 comment · 🟩 comment |
| PR Code Quality Reviewer |
🟨⬜ |
🟡 in flight |
🟨 run · ⬜ #36153 |
| Daily Model Inventory Checker |
🟨 |
🟡 in flight |
🟨 #36162 |
| Semantic Function Refactoring |
🟩🟨 |
🟡 in flight |
🟩 #36022 · 🟨 #36160 |
| AI Moderator |
🟨 |
🟡 in flight |
🟨 run |
| Daily Sentrux Report |
⬜ |
⚪ underdefined |
⬜ #36161 |
| Daily Observability Report for AWF Firewall and MCP Gateway |
⬜ |
⚪ underdefined |
⬜ #36157 |
| Daily Project Performance Summary Generator (Using MCP Scripts) |
⬜ |
⚪ underdefined |
⬜ #36152 |
| Lockfile Statistics Analysis Agent |
⬜ |
⚪ underdefined |
⬜ #36151 |
| Daily Team Evolution Insights |
⬜ |
⚪ underdefined |
⬜ #36150 |
| Daily AgentRx Trace Optimizer |
🟥 |
🟢 resolving |
🟥 #36159 |
| PR Description Updater |
🟩🟩 |
🟢 resolving |
🟩 #36158 · 🟩 #36146 |
| Daily Agent of the Day Blog Writer |
🟩 |
🟢 resolving |
🟩 #36158 |
| Test Quality Sentinel |
🟩🟩 |
🟢 resolving |
🟩 comment · 🟩 #36153 |
Legend:
- Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟥 rejected · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
- Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · 🟠 aging · 🔴 stuck · ⚪ underdefined
- References: one linked item per status emoji, in the same order as the Status column
🔴 Action Items
-
Underdefined daily report workflows — Five workflows (Daily Sentrux Report, Daily Observability Report, Daily Project Performance Summary, Lockfile Statistics, Daily Team Evolution Insights) produce discussion outputs with only existence-only signal. No engagement metrics available. Consider adding dedicated evaluators or clearer acceptance criteria.
-
Pending items aging >48h — Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer has 3 items pending 12,951 seconds (3.6 hours); PR Sous Chef has 2 items pending 13,362 and 16,716 seconds (4.7 hours). AI Moderator has 1 pending 8,222 seconds (2.3 hours). Review root cause for slow resolution.
-
Data quality: Weak signal evaluation — 5 of 27 outcomes (18.5%) evaluated with fallback existence-only check. Dedicated evaluators for discussion creation and pull request reviews would improve signal strength.
-
Zero-touch rate is 0% — All 10 accepted items required some form of human engagement. This indicates agent outputs are not self-sufficient or evaluation methodology requires engagement signals. Consider whether acceptance criteria are too strict.
Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends
Outcome Scorecard — 2026-06-01
| Metric |
Value |
Status |
| Acceptance rate |
90.9% |
🟢 >80% |
| Zero-touch rate |
0% |
🔴 <25% |
| Waste rate |
3.7% |
🟢 <10% |
| Median time to resolution |
31m |
— |
| Accepted |
10 / 27 |
— |
| — strong evidence |
5 |
merged, completed, approved |
| — medium evidence |
5 |
engaged, retained |
| — weak evidence |
0 |
existence only |
| Rejected |
1 |
— |
| Ignored |
0 |
no observable follow-up |
| Pending |
10 |
— |
| Unknown |
6 |
— |
| Runs checked |
17 |
— |
Per-Workflow Breakdown
| Workflow |
Accepted |
Rejected |
Ignored |
Pending |
Acceptance |
Zero-touch |
| Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
25% |
0% |
| PR Sous Chef |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
50% |
0% |
| PR Code Quality Reviewer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0% |
0% |
| Daily Model Inventory Checker |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0% |
0% |
| Semantic Function Refactoring |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
50% |
0% |
| AI Moderator |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0% |
0% |
| Daily Sentrux Report |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
| Daily Observability Report for AWF Firewall and MCP Gateway |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
| Daily Project Performance Summary Generator (Using MCP Scripts) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
| Lockfile Statistics Analysis Agent |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
| Daily Team Evolution Insights |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
| Daily AgentRx Trace Optimizer |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
| PR Description Updater |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100% |
0% |
| Daily Agent of the Day Blog Writer |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100% |
0% |
| Test Quality Sentinel |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100% |
0% |
Evidence Quality
⚠️ 5 item(s) (18.5%) were evaluated using only a generic existence check (signal: target_exists_only). These contribute to weak evidence and may overstate acceptance. Dedicated evaluators for create_discussion and other types provide stronger signal.
📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · haiku45 75.1K
Workflow Health — 2026-06-01
Executive read: Strong acceptance rate (91%) with 10 pending items across 6 workflows and 5 discussion items with uncertain status — underdefined evaluation for daily reporting workflows needs attention.
Legend:
🔴 Action Items
Underdefined daily report workflows — Five workflows (Daily Sentrux Report, Daily Observability Report, Daily Project Performance Summary, Lockfile Statistics, Daily Team Evolution Insights) produce discussion outputs with only existence-only signal. No engagement metrics available. Consider adding dedicated evaluators or clearer acceptance criteria.
Pending items aging >48h — Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer has 3 items pending 12,951 seconds (3.6 hours); PR Sous Chef has 2 items pending 13,362 and 16,716 seconds (4.7 hours). AI Moderator has 1 pending 8,222 seconds (2.3 hours). Review root cause for slow resolution.
Data quality: Weak signal evaluation — 5 of 27 outcomes (18.5%) evaluated with fallback existence-only check. Dedicated evaluators for discussion creation and pull request reviews would improve signal strength.
Zero-touch rate is 0% — All 10 accepted items required some form of human engagement. This indicates agent outputs are not self-sufficient or evaluation methodology requires engagement signals. Consider whether acceptance criteria are too strict.
Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends
Outcome Scorecard — 2026-06-01
Per-Workflow Breakdown
Evidence Quality