[cache-strategy] Cache Strategy Analysis - 2026-06-01 #36321
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #36516. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Cache Strategy Analysis Report
Date: 2026-06-01
Runs Analyzed: 13
Workflows with cache-memory: 7
Executive Summary
The last 24 hours were healthy for cache-memory usage. The observed workflows restored prior state successfully and then saved updated state back to cache-memory with restore-key fallbacks where expected. I did not find any workflow crossing the miss-streak or miss-rate thresholds for a new issue.
The only run that did not show a cache interaction was the analyzer itself, which is expected because it is the reporting pass and did not surface a cache miss pattern. No duplicate issues were created.
Findings
🟡 Medium Priority
No new findings. The workflows sampled today restored from prior cache state or wrote intended state without evidence of repeated cold starts.
Healthy Workflows
Issues Created Today
No new issues created - all observed workflows were either healthy or below threshold.
💾 Cache Memory Summary
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/cache-strategy/Report generated by the Daily Cache Strategy Analyzer
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions