You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On 2026-05-31, the gh-aw agentic workflow platform recorded 41 firewall-enabled runs across 26 distinct workflows in a single day. Of the 7 runs sampled for deep audit, 202 total network requests were observed — 164 allowed (81.2%) and 38 blocked (18.8%). All blocked traffic was attributed to the (unknown) domain category, indicating requests to destinations not resolvable by the firewall proxy or falling outside any named allow-rule. No policy-level rule attribution was available for these blocks.
On the DIFC front, zero integrity-filtered events were recorded in the last 7 days. The DIFC system did not trigger any tool-call filtering, indicating that all agentic tool usage during this window remained within declared integrity and secrecy boundaries. This is a positive signal for data-flow compliance.
The primary action item from this report is to investigate the 38 (unknown) blocked requests across PR Sous Chef and Daily SPDD Spec Planner workflows, and determine whether those requests represent legitimate destinations that need allowlisting or adversarial network probes.
🔥 Firewall Analysis
Key Firewall Metrics
Metric
Value
Workflows analyzed (firewall-enabled)
7 (of 41 total firewall-enabled runs)
Total network requests monitored
202
✅ Allowed requests
164
🚫 Blocked requests
38
Block rate
18.8%
Total unique blocked domain categories
1 ((unknown))
📈 Firewall Request Trends
All 41 firewall-enabled runs occurred on 2026-05-31 — the 7-day window shows concentrated activity in a single day. The stacked bar chart above breaks down allowed vs blocked requests per workflow. PR Sous Chef and Daily SPDD Spec Planner are the only two workflows generating blocked traffic, with 19 blocked requests each.
Top Blocked Domains
All blocked requests are attributed to the (unknown) category — destinations that the firewall proxy could not match to any named rule or resolvable domain. This warrants investigation into which specific IPs or hostnames are being attempted. The top allowed domains are api.githubcopilot.com:443 (118 requests), o205451.ingest.us.sentry.io:443 (33 requests), and api.anthropic.com:443 (13 requests).
Most Frequently Blocked Domains
Domain
Times Blocked
Workflows
(unknown)
38
PR Sous Chef, Daily SPDD Spec Planner
View Detailed Request Patterns by Workflow
Workflow
Allowed
Blocked
Block Rate
PR Sous Chef
44
19
30.2%
PR Description Updater
44
0
0%
Smoke CI
4
0
0%
Daily SPDD Spec Planner
57
19
25.0%
Design Decision Gate
15
0
0%
View Allowed Domains
Domain
Request Count
api.githubcopilot.com:443
118
o205451.ingest.us.sentry.io:443
33
api.anthropic.com:443
13
🔒 Firewall Security Recommendations
Investigate (unknown) blocked requests — Run gh aw audit <run-id> on PR Sous Chef and Daily SPDD Spec Planner runs and examine the raw firewall proxy logs to identify which specific hostnames or IPs are being blocked. The 19-request blocks in each workflow suggest a repeating pattern, possibly a retry loop hitting a missing allowlist entry.
Add explicit allow rules for legitimate destinations — If the (unknown) blocks resolve to known-safe services (e.g., package registries, external APIs), add named allow rules to the firewall policy to improve observability and reduce false-positive block noise.
Expand audit coverage — Only 7 of 41 firewall-enabled runs were deep-audited. Automate full-run auditing to capture the complete blocked-domain picture across all workflows.
Monitor Sentry ingestion endpoint — o205451.ingest.us.sentry.io:443 is allowed at 33 requests. Confirm this is intentional and that no sensitive workflow data is being included in error payloads.
🔒 DIFC Integrity Analysis
Key DIFC Metrics
Metric
Value
Total filtered events
0
Unique tools filtered
0
Unique workflows affected
0
Most common filter reason
N/A
Busiest day
N/A
📈 DIFC Events Over Time
No DIFC integrity-filtered events were recorded in the last 7 days. The DIFC system was active but did not trigger any tool-call filtering, indicating clean data-flow compliance across all agentic sessions.
🔧 Top Filtered Tools
No tools were filtered during this period.
🏷️ Filter Reasons and Tags
No filtering reasons or integrity/secrecy tags were recorded during the 7-day window.
💡 DIFC Tuning Recommendations
Maintain current DIFC configuration — Zero filtered events over 7 days with active agentic workflows indicates the integrity policy is appropriately calibrated. No tuning is needed at this time.
Verify DIFC coverage on high-risk workflows — Confirm that workflows with write-actuation capabilities (e.g., PR creation, issue modification) are included in DIFC monitoring scope to ensure continued clean reporting.
Establish a baseline alert threshold — With 0 events as the 7-day baseline, configure an alert for any day exceeding 5 filtered events to catch sudden policy violations early.
Generated by the Daily Security Observability workflow (consolidated from Daily Firewall Reporter + Daily DIFC Analyzer) Analysis window: Last 7 days | Repository: github/gh-aw
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
On 2026-05-31, the gh-aw agentic workflow platform recorded 41 firewall-enabled runs across 26 distinct workflows in a single day. Of the 7 runs sampled for deep audit, 202 total network requests were observed — 164 allowed (81.2%) and 38 blocked (18.8%). All blocked traffic was attributed to the
(unknown)domain category, indicating requests to destinations not resolvable by the firewall proxy or falling outside any named allow-rule. No policy-level rule attribution was available for these blocks.On the DIFC front, zero integrity-filtered events were recorded in the last 7 days. The DIFC system did not trigger any tool-call filtering, indicating that all agentic tool usage during this window remained within declared integrity and secrecy boundaries. This is a positive signal for data-flow compliance.
The primary action item from this report is to investigate the 38
(unknown)blocked requests across PR Sous Chef and Daily SPDD Spec Planner workflows, and determine whether those requests represent legitimate destinations that need allowlisting or adversarial network probes.🔥 Firewall Analysis
Key Firewall Metrics
(unknown))📈 Firewall Request Trends
All 41 firewall-enabled runs occurred on 2026-05-31 — the 7-day window shows concentrated activity in a single day. The stacked bar chart above breaks down allowed vs blocked requests per workflow. PR Sous Chef and Daily SPDD Spec Planner are the only two workflows generating blocked traffic, with 19 blocked requests each.
Top Blocked Domains
All blocked requests are attributed to the
(unknown)category — destinations that the firewall proxy could not match to any named rule or resolvable domain. This warrants investigation into which specific IPs or hostnames are being attempted. The top allowed domains areapi.githubcopilot.com:443(118 requests),o205451.ingest.us.sentry.io:443(33 requests), andapi.anthropic.com:443(13 requests).Most Frequently Blocked Domains
View Detailed Request Patterns by Workflow
View Allowed Domains
🔒 Firewall Security Recommendations
(unknown)blocked requests — Rungh aw audit <run-id>on PR Sous Chef and Daily SPDD Spec Planner runs and examine the raw firewall proxy logs to identify which specific hostnames or IPs are being blocked. The 19-request blocks in each workflow suggest a repeating pattern, possibly a retry loop hitting a missing allowlist entry.(unknown)blocks resolve to known-safe services (e.g., package registries, external APIs), add named allow rules to the firewall policy to improve observability and reduce false-positive block noise.o205451.ingest.us.sentry.io:443is allowed at 33 requests. Confirm this is intentional and that no sensitive workflow data is being included in error payloads.🔒 DIFC Integrity Analysis
Key DIFC Metrics
📈 DIFC Events Over Time
No DIFC integrity-filtered events were recorded in the last 7 days. The DIFC system was active but did not trigger any tool-call filtering, indicating clean data-flow compliance across all agentic sessions.
🔧 Top Filtered Tools
No tools were filtered during this period.
🏷️ Filter Reasons and Tags
No filtering reasons or integrity/secrecy tags were recorded during the 7-day window.
💡 DIFC Tuning Recommendations
Generated by the Daily Security Observability workflow (consolidated from Daily Firewall Reporter + Daily DIFC Analyzer)
Analysis window: Last 7 days | Repository: github/gh-aw
References:
§26717767921
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions