You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Mid-day snapshot β reflects 151 workflow runs completed as of ~11:30 UTC. Roughly 90 additional runs were still in progress at generation time and are not yet counted.
Today at a Glance
Metric
Value
π€ Total Runs
151 (134 β / 10 β / 7 β³ in progress)
π― Success Rate
93.1% (of completed runs)
π GitHub REST API Calls
59,440 (core quota consumed β includes reads, writes, and all GitHub API operations)
π Safe-Output Writes
107 (22 issues + 23 PRs + 47 comments + 15 discussions created by safe-output tools)
β± Avg Duration
393s (p95: 964s)
Activity was healthy today: a 93.1% success rate across 144 completed runs, with 59.4K of GitHub's REST API core quota consumed across 71 distinct workflows. No workflow came close to the 15,000 calls/hour ceiling, and the busiest single consumer (Smoke CI) accounted for 9.3K calls spread over 21 runs.
π GitHub API Calls Trend (90 days)
Daily REST API consumption has been volatile over the tracked window, swinging between ~18K and a peak of ~118K on 2026-05-27. After a three-day lull (05-28 β 05-30 hovering near 18β33K), today rebounds to 59.4K β slightly above the 7-day rolling average (~47K). The pattern suggests consumption is driven by bursty PR/CI activity rather than a steady baseline.
π GitHub API Calls by Workflow Trend (30 days)
The smoke-test family (Smoke CI, Smoke Claude/Gemini/Copilot) and the PR-review workflows (PR Sous Chef, PR Code Quality Reviewer) are the most consistent top consumers across the window. Spikes in the total line track days with heavy PR review and fuzzing activity, while the per-workflow lines stay comparatively stable β indicating the variation comes from how many runs fire, not from any single workflow becoming more expensive per run.
π GitHub REST API Calls Heatmap (90 days)
History currently spans 13 days (2026-05-18 β 2026-05-31), below the 14-day threshold for a calendar heatmap, so this panel falls back to today's top workflows by REST API consumption. Once β₯14 days accumulate, a MonβSun calendar heatmap will render here to surface weekly cadence and busiest days.
Consumption is moderately concentrated: the top 10 workflows account for ~68% (40.6K) of all REST API calls, with the remaining ~32% spread across 61 other workflows. Smoke CI alone is ~16% of the day's total. No single workflow dominates to the point of concentration risk, but the smoke + PR-review cluster is worth keeping an eye on if daily volume grows.
π GitHub REST API Consumption by Workflow (last 24h)
The heaviest consumers are Smoke CI (9.3K over 21 runs), Test Quality Sentinel (6.1K), and Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer (4.9K). All are comfortably below the red 15,000 calls/hour reference line β these are daily totals, so per-hour pressure is far lower. Smoke CI's high count reflects run frequency (21 runs) rather than per-run cost (~443 calls/run); batching or caching repository metadata reads across smoke runs would be the most impactful optimisation if quota ever becomes a concern.
Top 10 Workflows by REST API Consumption (last 24h)
Workflow
REST API Calls
Runs
Avg Duration
Smoke CI
9,297
21
101s
Test Quality Sentinel
6,081
7
279s
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer
4,943
7
345s
PR Code Quality Reviewer
4,666
7
336s
PR Sous Chef
4,086
10
472s
Design Decision Gate
3,186
7
289s
Auto-Triage Issues
2,541
4
284s
PR Description Updater
2,138
4
295s
Chaos PR Bundle Fuzzer
1,990
3
556s
[aw] Failure Investigator (6h)
1,692
2
2,541s
Trending Indicators
7-day API trend: β (insufficient data β needs β₯14 days, have 13)
30-day API trend: β (insufficient data β needs β₯60 days, have 13)
GitHub REST API call rate: ~46,583 calls/day averaged over the last 7 days (hourly limit: 15,000; daily headroom is large at this rate)
Cache restored from previous run: yes (12 entries)
Collection mode: backfill (only today's day recomputed; days 05-18 β 05-30 already complete in history were retained intact, as the 90-day fetch returned complete summaries only for today)
Logs start_date used: -90d (with a focused -1d follow-up pass)
Data points stored: 13
Earliest entry: 2026-05-18
Retention policy: 90 days
π Full Safe-Output Activity (24h)
All safe-output tool calls observed today (not just the four counted in the headline metric):
Safe-output type
Count
add_comment
47
create_pull_request_review_comment
26
create_pull_request
23
create_issue
22
create_discussion
15
submit_pull_request_review
15
update_issue
11
assign_to_agent
9
upload_asset
9
add_labels
6
update_pull_request
4
create_check_run
3
push_to_pull_request_branch
3
close_issue
1
missing_tool
1
noop
44
The headline Safe-Output Writes (107) counts only created issues, PRs, comments, and discussions per the report definition.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
π GitHub API Consumption Report
Report Date: 2026-05-31 Β· Repository: github/gh-aw Β· Run: #26711084394
Today at a Glance
Activity was healthy today: a 93.1% success rate across 144 completed runs, with 59.4K of GitHub's REST API core quota consumed across 71 distinct workflows. No workflow came close to the 15,000 calls/hour ceiling, and the busiest single consumer (Smoke CI) accounted for 9.3K calls spread over 21 runs.
π GitHub API Calls Trend (90 days)
Daily REST API consumption has been volatile over the tracked window, swinging between ~18K and a peak of ~118K on 2026-05-27. After a three-day lull (05-28 β 05-30 hovering near 18β33K), today rebounds to 59.4K β slightly above the 7-day rolling average (~47K). The pattern suggests consumption is driven by bursty PR/CI activity rather than a steady baseline.
π GitHub API Calls by Workflow Trend (30 days)
The smoke-test family (Smoke CI, Smoke Claude/Gemini/Copilot) and the PR-review workflows (PR Sous Chef, PR Code Quality Reviewer) are the most consistent top consumers across the window. Spikes in the total line track days with heavy PR review and fuzzing activity, while the per-workflow lines stay comparatively stable β indicating the variation comes from how many runs fire, not from any single workflow becoming more expensive per run.
π GitHub REST API Calls Heatmap (90 days)
History currently spans 13 days (2026-05-18 β 2026-05-31), below the 14-day threshold for a calendar heatmap, so this panel falls back to today's top workflows by REST API consumption. Once β₯14 days accumulate, a MonβSun calendar heatmap will render here to surface weekly cadence and busiest days.
π© Top API Burners (24h)
Consumption is moderately concentrated: the top 10 workflows account for ~68% (40.6K) of all REST API calls, with the remaining ~32% spread across 61 other workflows. Smoke CI alone is ~16% of the day's total. No single workflow dominates to the point of concentration risk, but the smoke + PR-review cluster is worth keeping an eye on if daily volume grows.
π GitHub REST API Consumption by Workflow (last 24h)
The heaviest consumers are Smoke CI (9.3K over 21 runs), Test Quality Sentinel (6.1K), and Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer (4.9K). All are comfortably below the red 15,000 calls/hour reference line β these are daily totals, so per-hour pressure is far lower. Smoke CI's high count reflects run frequency (21 runs) rather than per-run cost (~443 calls/run); batching or caching repository metadata reads across smoke runs would be the most impactful optimisation if quota ever becomes a concern.
Top 10 Workflows by REST API Consumption (last 24h)
Trending Indicators
π¦ Cache Memory Status
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/trending/api-consumption/history.jsonlπ Full Safe-Output Activity (24h)
All safe-output tool calls observed today (not just the four counted in the headline metric):
The headline Safe-Output Writes (107) counts only created issues, PRs, comments, and discussions per the report definition.
Automatically generated by the api-consumption-report workflow.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions