diff --git a/CHANGES.md b/CHANGES.md
index 0b6fcb17..23e9a57a 100644
--- a/CHANGES.md
+++ b/CHANGES.md
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ Fixes:
 - Fix 2 `TypeError`s raised in `get_citations(markup_text=...)` when
   `clean_steps` was omitted or lacked `"html"`. The documented fallback that
   prepends the `html` step was both unreachable and broken.
+- Keep a statute's trailing `note` designator as part of the citation's
+  identity. A note is a different provision than the section it is filed
+  under, so `42 U.S.C. § 1983 note` now carries `groups["note"]` and no
+  longer resolves to the bare `42 U.S.C. § 1983`. Prose such as
+  "§ 1983 notes that ..." is not treated as a designator. #323
 
 ## Current
 
diff --git a/eyecite/helpers.py b/eyecite/helpers.py
index 84213cb5..bae64f36 100644
--- a/eyecite/helpers.py
+++ b/eyecite/helpers.py
@@ -890,6 +890,10 @@ def add_law_metadata(citation: FullLawCitation, words: Tokens) -> None:
         return
 
     citation.full_span_end = citation.span()[1] + m.end()
+    # A note is a different provision than the section it is filed under, so it
+    # belongs to the citation's identity, which is built from groups.
+    if m["note"]:
+        citation.groups["note"] = m["note"]
     citation.metadata.pin_cite = clean_pin_cite(m["pin_cite"]) or None
     citation.metadata.publisher = m["publisher"]
     citation.metadata.day = m["day"]
diff --git a/eyecite/models.py b/eyecite/models.py
index bfff85a8..c92429b7 100644
--- a/eyecite/models.py
+++ b/eyecite/models.py
@@ -408,6 +408,8 @@ def corrected_citation_full(self):
         m = self.metadata
         if m.pin_cite:
             parts.append(f"{m.pin_cite}")
+        if note := self.groups.get("note"):
+            parts.append(f" {note}")
         publisher_date = " ".join(
             i for i in (m.publisher, m.month, m.day, m.year) if i
         )
diff --git a/eyecite/regexes.py b/eyecite/regexes.py
index df1cdddf..f4e27e95 100644
--- a/eyecite/regexes.py
+++ b/eyecite/regexes.py
@@ -259,6 +259,22 @@ def reference_pin_cite_re(regexes):
     )
 """
 
+# Law note regex:
+# A trailing "note" points at material filed under a section rather than at the
+# section itself, so it is a different target and not a pin cite. Unlike
+# "et seq." the word is ordinary English, so it only counts as a designator
+# when nothing continues it: "notes that ..." must not match.
+LAW_NOTE_REGEX = r"""
+    (?:
+        \ (?P<note>note)
+        (?=
+            [,.;)\]\\]|  # ending punctuation
+            \ ?[(\[]|    # space and start of parens
+            $            # end of text
+        )
+    )?
+"""
+
 # Short cite antecedent regex:
 # What case does a short cite refer to? For now, we just capture the previous
 # word optionally followed by a comma. Example: Adarand, 515 U.S. at 241.
@@ -363,6 +379,7 @@ def reference_pin_cite_re(regexes):
 # and then may be followed by a parenthetical:
 POST_LAW_CITATION_REGEX = rf"""
     {LAW_PIN_CITE_REGEX}?
+    {LAW_NOTE_REGEX}
     \ ?
     (?:\(
         # Consol., McKinney, Deering, West, LexisNexis, etc.
diff --git a/tests/test_FindTest.py b/tests/test_FindTest.py
index 9d03d354..32d80b53 100644
--- a/tests/test_FindTest.py
+++ b/tests/test_FindTest.py
@@ -1015,6 +1015,43 @@ def test_find_law_citations(self):
              [law_citation('Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 1, §§ 2-3',
                            reporter='Mass. Gen. Laws',
                            groups={'chapter': '1', 'section': '2-3'})]),
+            # note designator, a different provision than the section
+            ('42 U.S.C. § 1983 note',
+             [law_citation('42 U.S.C. § 1983 note', reporter='U.S.C.',
+                           groups={'title': '42', 'section': '1983',
+                                   'note': 'note'})]),
+            ('28 U.S.C. § 994 note',
+             [law_citation('28 U.S.C. § 994 note', reporter='U.S.C.',
+                           groups={'title': '28', 'section': '994',
+                                   'note': 'note'})]),
+            ('8 U.S.C. § 1101 note',
+             [law_citation('8 U.S.C. § 1101 note', reporter='U.S.C.',
+                           groups={'title': '8', 'section': '1101',
+                                   'note': 'note'})]),
+            # note after a subsection pin cite
+            ('Fla. Stat. § 120.68(2) note',
+             [law_citation('Fla. Stat. § 120.68(2) note',
+                           reporter='Fla. Stat.',
+                           metadata={'pin_cite': '(2)'},
+                           groups={'section': '120.68', 'note': 'note'})]),
+            # note before a year parenthetical
+            ('42 U.S.C. § 1983 note (1994)',
+             [law_citation('42 U.S.C. § 1983 note (1994)', reporter='U.S.C.',
+                           groups={'title': '42', 'section': '1983',
+                                   'note': 'note'},
+                           year=1994)]),
+            # et seq. is part of the section, so it stays a pin cite
+            ('42 U.S.C. § 1983 et seq.',
+             [law_citation('42 U.S.C. § 1983 et seq.', reporter='U.S.C.',
+                           metadata={'pin_cite': 'et seq.'},
+                           groups={'title': '42', 'section': '1983'})]),
+            # "note" as prose, not a designator
+            ('42 U.S.C. § 1983 notes that liability attaches',
+             [law_citation('42 U.S.C. § 1983', reporter='U.S.C.',
+                           groups={'title': '42', 'section': '1983'})]),
+            ('42 U.S.C. § 1983. Note that the court',
+             [law_citation('42 U.S.C. § 1983', reporter='U.S.C.',
+                           groups={'title': '42', 'section': '1983'})]),
         )
         # fmt: on
         self.run_test_pairs(test_pairs, "Law citation extraction")
diff --git a/tests/test_ModelsTest.py b/tests/test_ModelsTest.py
index b195530b..20c75de9 100644
--- a/tests/test_ModelsTest.py
+++ b/tests/test_ModelsTest.py
@@ -158,6 +158,18 @@ def test_unknown_citation_comparison(self):
         self.assertNotEqual(hash(citations[0]), hash(citations[1]))
         print("✓")
 
+    def test_law_note_comparison(self):
+        """Is a statutory note a different citation than the section it is
+        filed under?"""
+        citations = [
+            get_citations("42 U.S.C. § 1983")[0],
+            get_citations("42 U.S.C. § 1983 note")[0],
+        ]
+        print("Testing law note comparison...", end=" ")
+        self.assertNotEqual(citations[0], citations[1])
+        self.assertNotEqual(hash(citations[0]), hash(citations[1]))
+        print("✓")
+
     def test_missing_page_cite_conversion(self):
         """Do citations with missing page numbers get their groups['page']
         attribute set to None?"""
@@ -222,6 +234,14 @@ def test_corrected_full_citation_includes_closing_parenthesis(self):
             "Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 60 (scotus 1986)",
         )
 
+    def test_corrected_full_citation_includes_law_note(self):
+        """Does the corrected_citation_full method keep a note designator?"""
+        law_note_citation = get_citations("42 U.S.C. § 1983 note")[0]
+        self.assertEqual(
+            law_note_citation.corrected_citation_full(),
+            "42 U.S.C. § 1983 note",
+        )
+
     def test_page_correction(self):
         """Can we correct pages on citation.corrected_citation()?"""
         tests = [