You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an enterprise admin I want performance analytics and capacity planning tools So that I can optimize platform performance and plan for organizational growth
Where: Knowledge service — analytics layer on top of monitoring data
Refined: Story is detailed, estimated, and ready for development
In Progress: Story is actively being developed
Done: Story delivered and accepted
Acceptance Criteria
Functional Requirements
Given an enterprise admin When they call GET /api/v1/organizations/acme/performance/trends?metric=latency_p95&period=30d&granularity=daily Then the service returns time-series data of p95 latency over the last 30 days with daily granularity
Given an enterprise admin When they call GET /api/v1/organizations/acme/performance/storage Then the service returns: current usage, quota, growth rate (bytes/day), projected full date based on linear extrapolation
Given an enterprise admin When they call GET /api/v1/organizations/acme/performance/endpoints Then the service returns per-endpoint breakdown: avg latency, request count, error rate, sorted by latency desc (slowest first)
Given historical performance data When the capacity projection runs Then it calculates: days until storage quota exceeded, days until connection pool saturation (based on growth trend), with confidence interval
Given an admin needs a performance report When they call GET /api/v1/organizations/acme/performance/report?period=2026-Q1&format=json Then the service returns a comprehensive report: latency trends, throughput trends, error rate trends, storage growth, capacity projections, top issues
Analytics queries return in <500ms for 90-day range
Projection accuracy validated against historical data
Anomaly detection correctly flags outliers
Story Sizing and Sprint Readiness
Refined Story Points
Final Story Points: L(5) Confidence Level: Medium Sizing Justification: Builds on monitoring data from #164. Query Prometheus API, aggregate, project. Moderate analytics logic. No new data collection.
Sprint Capacity Validation
Sprint Fit Assessment: Fits in single sprint Total Effort Assessment: Yes
Testing Methods: Unit tests for projection math and aggregation; integration tests with seeded Prometheus data Test Data Requirements: Historical metrics data (at least 30 days simulated) Environment Requirements: Prometheus test instance with seeded data
Notes
Refinement Insights: All data comes from existing monitoring stack — no new data collection needed. Focus is on analytics, aggregation, and presentation.
Technical Analysis
Implementation Approach
Technical Strategy: Query Prometheus HTTP API for metrics data. Aggregate and project in application layer. Cache computed results (TTL 1 hour). Linear regression for capacity projection. Key Components: Performance analytics service, Prometheus query client, projection calculator, report generator, results cache Data Flow: API request → query Prometheus API → aggregate → project → cache → response
Technical Requirements
Prometheus query API: api/v1/query_range for time-series data
Linear regression: simple least-squares for capacity projection (no external ML library needed)
Cache: in-memory or Redis cache with 1-hour TTL for computed results
Report: JSON template with sections for each metric category
Technical Risks and Mitigation
Risk
Impact
Probability
Mitigation Strategy
Prometheus query latency for large time ranges
Medium
Medium
Use recording rules for pre-aggregation; cache results
Story Statement
As an enterprise admin
I want performance analytics and capacity planning tools
So that I can optimize platform performance and plan for organizational growth
Where: Knowledge service — analytics layer on top of monitoring data
Epic Context
Parent Epic: Platform Hardening & Enterprise Readiness #68
Status: Refined
Priority: P1 (Should-Have)
Status Workflow
Acceptance Criteria
Functional Requirements
Given an enterprise admin
When they call GET
/api/v1/organizations/acme/performance/trends?metric=latency_p95&period=30d&granularity=dailyThen the service returns time-series data of p95 latency over the last 30 days with daily granularity
Given an enterprise admin
When they call GET
/api/v1/organizations/acme/performance/storageThen the service returns: current usage, quota, growth rate (bytes/day), projected full date based on linear extrapolation
Given an enterprise admin
When they call GET
/api/v1/organizations/acme/performance/endpointsThen the service returns per-endpoint breakdown: avg latency, request count, error rate, sorted by latency desc (slowest first)
Given historical performance data
When the capacity projection runs
Then it calculates: days until storage quota exceeded, days until connection pool saturation (based on growth trend), with confidence interval
Given an admin needs a performance report
When they call GET
/api/v1/organizations/acme/performance/report?period=2026-Q1&format=jsonThen the service returns a comprehensive report: latency trends, throughput trends, error rate trends, storage growth, capacity projections, top issues
Business Rules
Edge Cases and Error Handling
Definition of Done Checklist
Development Completion
Quality Assurance
Story Sizing and Sprint Readiness
Refined Story Points
Final Story Points: L(5)
Confidence Level: Medium
Sizing Justification: Builds on monitoring data from #164. Query Prometheus API, aggregate, project. Moderate analytics logic. No new data collection.
Sprint Capacity Validation
Sprint Fit Assessment: Fits in single sprint
Total Effort Assessment: Yes
Dependencies and Coordination
Story Dependencies
Prerequisite Stories: #164 (Monitoring — provides metrics data source)
Dependent Stories: #169 (SLA Reporting — shares analytics infrastructure)
Validation and Testing Strategy
Acceptance Testing Approach
Testing Methods: Unit tests for projection math and aggregation; integration tests with seeded Prometheus data
Test Data Requirements: Historical metrics data (at least 30 days simulated)
Environment Requirements: Prometheus test instance with seeded data
Notes
Refinement Insights: All data comes from existing monitoring stack — no new data collection needed. Focus is on analytics, aggregation, and presentation.
Technical Analysis
Implementation Approach
Technical Strategy: Query Prometheus HTTP API for metrics data. Aggregate and project in application layer. Cache computed results (TTL 1 hour). Linear regression for capacity projection.
Key Components: Performance analytics service, Prometheus query client, projection calculator, report generator, results cache
Data Flow: API request → query Prometheus API → aggregate → project → cache → response
Technical Requirements
api/v1/query_rangefor time-series dataTechnical Risks and Mitigation
Spike Requirements
Required Spikes: None