You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a platform operations engineer I want complete monitoring and alerting for the knowledge service So that I can ensure SLA compliance, detect issues proactively, and respond to incidents rapidly
Where: Knowledge service infrastructure — monitoring stack + alerting pipeline
Refined: Story is detailed, estimated, and ready for development
In Progress: Story is actively being developed
Done: Story delivered and accepted
Acceptance Criteria
Functional Requirements
Given the knowledge service is running When an ops engineer accesses the metrics endpoint GET /metrics Then it returns Prometheus-format metrics: request_duration_seconds (p50/p95/p99), request_total (by method/status), active_connections, db_pool_utilization, s3_operation_duration
Given request latency p95 exceeds 500ms for 5 minutes When the alert rule evaluates Then a "High Latency" alert fires with severity "warning" to configured channels (email, Slack webhook)
Given error rate exceeds 5% for 2 minutes When the alert rule evaluates Then a "High Error Rate" alert fires with severity "critical" and escalation to PagerDuty/webhook
Given the service is running with monitoring enabled When an ops engineer accesses the health dashboard Then they see: request rate, latency percentiles, error rate, active connections, DB connection pool status, S3 operation status, uptime counter
Given a health check endpoint When the liveness probe calls GET /api/v1/health/live Then it returns 200 if the process is alive (no dependency check) When the readiness probe calls GET /api/v1/health/ready Then it returns 200 only if DB and S3 are reachable, 503 otherwise
Given the service emits structured logs When any request is processed Then the log includes: correlation_id, method, path, status, duration_ms, user_id (if authenticated), timestamp in JSON format
Business Rules
Metrics format: Prometheus exposition format (compatible with Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog)
Monitoring dashboard configuration (Grafana or equivalent)
Unit tests for metrics collection and health probes
Integration tests for alerting flow
Quality Assurance
Metrics collection adds <5ms latency
Alert fires within 30s of threshold breach
All health probes return correct status under various conditions
Structured logs parseable by log aggregator
Deployment and Release
Monitoring stack deployment documented (Prometheus + Grafana or cloud equivalent)
Alert channel credentials configured
Dashboard templates included in deployment
Story Sizing and Sprint Readiness
Refined Story Points
Final Story Points: XL(10) Confidence Level: Low Sizing Justification: Full observability stack — metrics instrumentation, health probes, structured logging, alert rules, dashboard, channel integration. Broadest story in the epic. Infrastructure choice significantly impacts effort.
Sprint Capacity Validation
Sprint Fit Assessment: May not fit in single sprint Total Effort Assessment: Borderline
Testing Methods: Integration tests: trigger high latency/error rate → verify alert fires; unit tests for metrics collection, health probes; load test for metrics overhead Test Data Requirements: Simulated load for alert threshold testing Environment Requirements: Prometheus test instance, mock alert channels
Notes
Refinement Insights: ADR needed for monitoring stack choice (Prometheus+Grafana vs cloud-native). This decision affects deployment complexity for all enterprises.
Technical Analysis
Implementation Approach
Technical Strategy: Instrument service with prom-client (Prometheus Node.js client). Expose /metrics endpoint. Health probes as lightweight endpoints. Structured logging via pino (JSON format, correlation ID via cls-hooked or AsyncLocalStorage). Alert rules as Prometheus recording/alerting rules or Alertmanager config. Key Components: Metrics middleware (prom-client), health probe endpoints, structured logger (pino), alert rule configs, Grafana dashboard JSON Data Flow: Request → metrics middleware (record latency/status) → handler → structured log → response. Prometheus scrapes /metrics → evaluates alert rules → Alertmanager → channels
Technical Requirements
prom-client for Prometheus metrics (histogram for latency, counter for requests, gauge for connections)
pino for structured JSON logging (fast, low overhead)
AsyncLocalStorage for correlation ID propagation
Health probes: /api/v1/health/live (200 always), /api/v1/health/ready (200 if DB+S3 OK), /api/v1/health/startup (200 after init)
Grafana dashboard: JSON template with panels for request rate, latency percentiles, error rate, DB pool, uptime
Technical Risks and Mitigation
Risk
Impact
Probability
Mitigation Strategy
Monitoring stack complexity for self-hosted enterprises
High
Medium
Provide both self-hosted (Prometheus+Grafana) and cloud-native (Datadog/CloudWatch) guides
High cardinality metrics (per-endpoint labels)
Medium
Medium
Limit label cardinality; use route patterns, not full paths
Spike Requirements
Required Spikes: Evaluate monitoring stack (Prometheus+Grafana self-hosted vs cloud-native) — record as ADR
Story Statement
As a platform operations engineer
I want complete monitoring and alerting for the knowledge service
So that I can ensure SLA compliance, detect issues proactively, and respond to incidents rapidly
Where: Knowledge service infrastructure — monitoring stack + alerting pipeline
Epic Context
Parent Epic: Platform Hardening & Enterprise Readiness #68
Status: Refined
Priority: P0 (Must-Have)
Status Workflow
Acceptance Criteria
Functional Requirements
Given the knowledge service is running
When an ops engineer accesses the metrics endpoint GET
/metricsThen it returns Prometheus-format metrics: request_duration_seconds (p50/p95/p99), request_total (by method/status), active_connections, db_pool_utilization, s3_operation_duration
Given request latency p95 exceeds 500ms for 5 minutes
When the alert rule evaluates
Then a "High Latency" alert fires with severity "warning" to configured channels (email, Slack webhook)
Given error rate exceeds 5% for 2 minutes
When the alert rule evaluates
Then a "High Error Rate" alert fires with severity "critical" and escalation to PagerDuty/webhook
Given the service is running with monitoring enabled
When an ops engineer accesses the health dashboard
Then they see: request rate, latency percentiles, error rate, active connections, DB connection pool status, S3 operation status, uptime counter
Given a health check endpoint
When the liveness probe calls GET
/api/v1/health/liveThen it returns 200 if the process is alive (no dependency check)
When the readiness probe calls GET
/api/v1/health/readyThen it returns 200 only if DB and S3 are reachable, 503 otherwise
Given the service emits structured logs
When any request is processed
Then the log includes: correlation_id, method, path, status, duration_ms, user_id (if authenticated), timestamp in JSON format
Business Rules
Edge Cases and Error Handling
Definition of Done Checklist
Development Completion
Quality Assurance
Deployment and Release
Story Sizing and Sprint Readiness
Refined Story Points
Final Story Points: XL(10)
Confidence Level: Low
Sizing Justification: Full observability stack — metrics instrumentation, health probes, structured logging, alert rules, dashboard, channel integration. Broadest story in the epic. Infrastructure choice significantly impacts effort.
Sprint Capacity Validation
Sprint Fit Assessment: May not fit in single sprint
Total Effort Assessment: Borderline
Story Splitting Recommendations
Dependencies and Coordination
Story Dependencies
Prerequisite Stories: Epic #66 #149 (Org Setup — service must be running)
Dependent Stories: #168 (Performance Analytics), #169 (SLA Reporting) — consume monitoring data
External Dependencies
Infrastructure Requirements: Prometheus (or compatible), Grafana, alert channel endpoints (Slack, PagerDuty)
Validation and Testing Strategy
Acceptance Testing Approach
Testing Methods: Integration tests: trigger high latency/error rate → verify alert fires; unit tests for metrics collection, health probes; load test for metrics overhead
Test Data Requirements: Simulated load for alert threshold testing
Environment Requirements: Prometheus test instance, mock alert channels
Notes
Refinement Insights: ADR needed for monitoring stack choice (Prometheus+Grafana vs cloud-native). This decision affects deployment complexity for all enterprises.
Technical Analysis
Implementation Approach
Technical Strategy: Instrument service with prom-client (Prometheus Node.js client). Expose /metrics endpoint. Health probes as lightweight endpoints. Structured logging via pino (JSON format, correlation ID via cls-hooked or AsyncLocalStorage). Alert rules as Prometheus recording/alerting rules or Alertmanager config.
Key Components: Metrics middleware (prom-client), health probe endpoints, structured logger (pino), alert rule configs, Grafana dashboard JSON
Data Flow: Request → metrics middleware (record latency/status) → handler → structured log → response. Prometheus scrapes /metrics → evaluates alert rules → Alertmanager → channels
Technical Requirements
prom-clientfor Prometheus metrics (histogram for latency, counter for requests, gauge for connections)pinofor structured JSON logging (fast, low overhead)AsyncLocalStoragefor correlation ID propagation/api/v1/health/live(200 always),/api/v1/health/ready(200 if DB+S3 OK),/api/v1/health/startup(200 after init)Technical Risks and Mitigation
Spike Requirements
Required Spikes: Evaluate monitoring stack (Prometheus+Grafana self-hosted vs cloud-native) — record as ADR