Replies: 3 comments
|
Its an interesting idea, but not one I'm likely to pursue for the following reasons:
Did you see some benefits to the Rust crate that I missed? |
0 replies
|
Makes sense. I didn't really look at features, it was more about looking to the future and possibly more safety, especially as it's used as a NIF (see for example the bit about webp: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1cj94va/image_v025_performance_improvements/ ) |
0 replies
|
Closing for now. I don't see a future in which Image moves away from |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I came across this crate and thought it may be cool if Image supported it as an alternative backend https://crates.io/crates/image (and not only because of the shared name ;)
A quick search turned up a writeup about using it as a NIF:
https://fly.io/phoenix-files/elixir-and-rust-is-a-good-mix/
and an old library doing so:
https://github.com/scrogson/mirage
Thoughts?
All reactions