@@ -246,6 +246,21 @@ because it turns other people's test suites red.
 
 ### Changed
 
+- **A spreadsheet can now be built wider than a spreadsheet can open.** The
+  `columns` setting of `xlsx` used to stop at 64. It now reaches 32768, which is
+  the ceiling `csv` already had.
+
+  The number matters because of where a reader stops. Excel and LibreOffice
+  Calc both hold 16384 columns. Measured with Calc: a sheet of 16384 columns
+  opens whole, and a sheet of 16385 opens as 16384 - the last column is dropped
+  and nothing is said about it. At a ceiling of 64 there was no way to build a
+  file that asks a spreadsheet about its own limit, which is the kind of file
+  this tool exists to produce.
+
+  `rows` times `columns` still cannot pass 2 million cells, so a sheet 16385
+  columns wide holds up to 122 rows. Nothing about a sheet of 64 columns or
+  fewer changes, and the default is still one column.
+
 - **Byte counts are grouped in threes.** A total used to print as
   `2516582400 B`. It now prints as `2 516 582 400 B`, in every message that
   names a number of bytes - `tfg formats`, the summary a run prints, what a
 
@@ -39,9 +39,23 @@ const (
 	maxRows = 200_000
 
 	minColumns = 1
-	// Sixteen thousand three hundred and eighty four is the format's own limit.
-	// This one is the width a person would actually look at.
-	maxColumns = 64
+	// maxColumns is deliberately ABOVE the width of a spreadsheet, and that is
+	// the whole reason for the number. It is the same ceiling CSV carries, for
+	// the same question asked of the same reader.
+	//
+	// It said 64 until 2026-09-08, with the reason "the width a person would
+	// actually look at". That reason describes a document somebody reads, and
+	// this tool writes fixtures somebody tests with - a ceiling belongs to the
+	// reader under test, not to our own comfort. At 64 there was no way to
+	// build a sheet that asks Excel about its own limit at all.
+	//
+	// Measured 2026-09-08 with LibreOffice Calc 26.2.5.2 headless, on
+	// workbooks built outside this tool because this tool could not build
+	// them: 16384 columns come back whole, and 16385 come back as 16384 with
+	// the last column dropped, exit 0 and not one word on either stream. That
+	// silent loss is the thing a tester needs a fixture for, and standing on
+	// both sides of the line is what a boundary set is.
+	maxColumns = 32768
 
 	// The sheet is held in memory while the package is built, so the pair is
 	// bounded as well as each side.
@@ -75,7 +89,7 @@ func init() {
 				Name: "columns", Kind: format.PropertyInt,
 				Min: minColumns, Max: maxColumns, Unit: "columns",
 				Default: "1",
-				Detail:  "How many columns each row has.",
+				Detail:  "How many columns each row has. Above 16384 a spreadsheet may show only the first 16384 and drop the rest without a word.",
 			},
 		},
 		JointLimits: []format.JointLimit{{
 
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+package guard
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/donislawdev/TestingFilesGenerator/internal/format"
+	_ "github.com/donislawdev/TestingFilesGenerator/internal/format/all"
+)
+
+// spreadsheetWidth is where a spreadsheet stops, measured rather than
+// remembered: 2026-09-03 for CSV and again 2026-09-08 for XLSX, both with
+// LibreOffice Calc 26.2.5.2 headless. A table of this many columns comes back
+// whole. One column more comes back with this many, the last column dropped,
+// exit 0 and not one word on either stream.
+const spreadsheetWidth = 16384
+
+// narrowerOnPurpose names a format whose columns cannot reach past a
+// spreadsheet because the format itself stops first, with the reason.
+//
+// It is empty, and that is the point rather than an oversight. A format ends up
+// here only when its OWN structure caps it - the way an icon stores each side
+// in a single byte - and never because a smaller number felt tidier. Writing
+// the reason down is the price of the exception, which is what stops this
+// becoming the sort of list somebody adds to instead of thinking.
+var narrowerOnPurpose = map[string]string{}
+
+// A format with columns has to offer more of them than a spreadsheet accepts.
+//
+// The ceiling of a setting belongs to the reader under test, not to what this
+// tool finds comfortable to write. Standing on both sides of a limit is what a
+// boundary set is for, so a ceiling that stops at the limit offers the last
+// table that survives and never the first that does not.
+//
+// This is not hypothetical tidiness, it is a defect this project shipped.
+// XLSX declared 64 from the day it was written until 2026-09-08, with the
+// reason "the width a person would actually look at" - which describes a
+// document somebody reads rather than a fixture somebody tests with. CSV asked
+// the same question of the same reader and answered 32768. Nothing compared
+// them, and at 64 there was no way to build a sheet that asks Excel about its
+// own limit at all.
+//
+// What it asks about is the OFFER, because that is what a ceiling is. That the
+// file itself works was measured on 2026-09-08 rather than asserted here: a
+// workbook of 16385 columns built by this tool converts through Calc at exit 0
+// and comes back with 16384, which is the same silent loss a workbook from
+// another writer produces. Building one costs twelve megabytes, which is not a
+// price worth paying on every run of this suite.
+//
+// Asked of every registered format rather than of the two that have the
+// setting today, so a third tabular format is covered on the day it arrives.
+func TestAFormatWithColumnsReachesPastWhatASpreadsheetAccepts(t *testing.T) {
+	examined := 0
+
+	for _, d := range format.All() {
+		for _, p := range d.Properties {
+			if p.Name != "columns" || p.Kind != format.PropertyInt {
+				continue
+			}
+			if why, narrow := narrowerOnPurpose[d.ID]; narrow {
+				if p.Max > spreadsheetWidth {
+					t.Errorf("%s is excused as narrower on purpose (%s) and reaches %d anyway - take the excuse off",
+						d.ID, why, p.Max)
+				}
+				continue
+			}
+			examined++
+			if p.Max <= spreadsheetWidth {
+				t.Errorf("%s offers at most %d columns and a spreadsheet accepts %d, "+
+					"so no fixture built from it can ask the reader about its own limit - "+
+					"raise the ceiling, or name the structural reason in narrowerOnPurpose",
+					d.ID, p.Max, spreadsheetWidth)
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	if examined == 0 {
+		t.Fatal("no format offers a column count, so this proved nothing")
+	}
+}
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ <h2>Settings each format accepts</h2>
     <tr>
       <td></td>
       <td><code>columns</code></td>
-      <td>1 - 64 columns</td>
+      <td>1 - 32768 columns</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td><code>xml</code></td>
 
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ <h2>Ustawienia, które przyjmuje każdy format</h2>
     <tr>
       <td></td>
       <td><code>columns</code></td>
-      <td>1 - 64 kolumn</td>
+      <td>1 - 32768 kolumn</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>
       <td><code>xml</code></td>