Dear {{ data['first-name'] or 'Sarah' }},
+ + +Please verify your email address
+To complete your registration and access Compass, please verify your email address by clicking the link below:
+ +This link will expire in 24 hours.
+ +If the link doesn't work, copy and paste this link into your browser:
+ + +{% endblock %} + + + + + diff --git a/app/views/v3/create-account/email-welcome.html b/app/views/v3/create-account/email-welcome.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..159f986 --- /dev/null +++ b/app/views/v3/create-account/email-welcome.html @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ + +{% extends prototypeVersion + '/layouts/emails.html' %} +{% set subject = "Welcome to Compass – Please verify your email" %} +{% set from = "CompassDear {{ data['first-name'] or 'Sarah' }},
+ +Welcome to Compass - the NHS service for sharing medical technology evaluations across trusts.
+ +Your account has been created for {{ to }}.
+ + + + ++ +
Didn't request this account?
+If you didn't request a Compass account, please ignore this email. No account will be created unless you verify your email address.
+ +{% endblock %} + + + + + diff --git a/app/views/v3/dashboard.html b/app/views/v3/dashboard.html new file mode 100755 index 0000000..c9736aa --- /dev/null +++ b/app/views/v3/dashboard.html @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ + + +{% extends prototypeVersion + '/layouts/layout-signed-in.html' %} + +{% set pageName = "Medical product evaluations" %} +{% set serviceHeader = "Medical product evaluations" %} + + + +{% block beforeContent %} +{% endblock %} + +{% block content %} + + + + + +Welcome back
+ +How will you shape procurement in your trust today?
+ + + +Share your evaluation
+ +Choose how you'd like to share your evaluation:
+ ++ Quick share +
++ Upload existing evaluation documents +
+ + ++ Full evaluation form +
++ Create a structured evaluation +
+ + + ++ SmartPump 300 Infusion System +
+ ++ Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust +
+ ++ Evaluation summary +
+ +-
+
- + Trust + +
- + Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust + +
- + Hospital site + +
- + St James's University Hospital + +
- + Department + +
- + Critical Care Unit + +
- + Evaluation type + +
- + 6-month clinical trial with control group + +
- + Evaluation period + +
- + January 2023 - June 2023 + +
- + Scale of deployment + +
- + 24 SmartPump 300 devices + +
- + Overall rating + +
- + 4.5/5 + +
- + Recommendation + +
- + Would recommend + +
- + Procurement decision + +
- + Procured - Trust-wide rollout approved August 2023 + +
- + Report date + +
- + July 2023 + +
Executive summary
++ Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust conducted a 6-month clinical trial evaluating the SmartPump 300 Infusion System in the Critical Care Unit at St James's University Hospital. The trial compared the SmartPump 300 against our existing infusion pump system with a focus on medication administration safety, staff satisfaction, and operational efficiency. +
++ The evaluation demonstrated a 45% reduction in medication administration errors and high levels of staff satisfaction. Integration with our Epic electronic health record system was seamless. Based on these positive outcomes, the Trust approved procurement and trust-wide rollout in August 2023. +
+ +Key outcome: 45% reduction in medication administration errors compared to previous system
+Evaluation approach
+ +Methodology
++ We conducted a prospective, controlled clinical trial over 6 months. Twenty-four SmartPump 300 devices were deployed in the Critical Care Unit alongside our existing infusion pump fleet, allowing for direct comparison of outcomes. +
+ +Evaluation criteria
+-
+
- Clinical safety: Medication administration error rates, adverse drug events, alarm management +
- Staff experience: User satisfaction, training time requirements, workflow integration +
- Technical performance: Device reliability, battery life, connectivity +
- System integration: EHR interoperability, drug library management, audit trail functionality +
- Business case: Total cost of ownership, error reduction value, efficiency gains +
Data collection
++ We collected quantitative data on error rates, device uptime, and training hours. Qualitative feedback was gathered through nursing staff surveys (n=58), focus groups (n=3), and pharmacy team interviews (n=4). Clinical outcomes were tracked through our incident reporting system and EHR analytics. +
+ + {# Key Findings #} +Key findings
+ +Clinical safety and outcomes
+ +Medication administration errors
++ 45% reduction in medication administration errors compared to previous system during the trial period. +
+-
+
- Previous system: 22 errors per 10,000 infusions +
- SmartPump 300: 12 errors per 10,000 infusions +
- Most common errors prevented: incorrect rate programming, wrong concentration +
Nursing staff confidence
++ Staff reported significantly improved confidence in medication administration safety. +
+-
+
- 87% of nursing staff rated the drug library alerts as "very helpful" or "extremely helpful" +
- 92% felt more confident administering high-risk medications +
- Staff particularly valued the clear visual interface and soft limit warnings +
System integration
+ +Epic EHR integration
++ Seamless integration with our Epic Hyperspace system using HL7 FHIR standards. +
+-
+
- Automatic population of infusion orders from Epic +
- Real-time infusion data flowing back to patient chart +
- No manual transcription required +
- Pharmacy team reported improved oversight and audit capabilities +
Staff training and adoption
+ +Training efficiency
++ Training time was significantly shorter than anticipated. +
+-
+
- Budgeted: 4 hours per staff member +
- Actual average: 2 hours per staff member +
- 50% reduction in training time saved approximately £8,400 in staff costs +
- Staff found the touchscreen interface intuitive and similar to consumer devices +
Technical performance
+ +
+ Device uptime: 99.7% (exceeding manufacturer specification of 99.5%)
+ Wi-Fi connectivity: Stable throughout trial period after initial network configuration
+ Battery performance: Average 6.5 hours (manufacturer spec: 7 hours)
+
Challenges and concerns
+ ++ + Important: + Challenges identified during evaluation + +
+ +Alert fatigue (initial)
++ During the first 2 weeks of deployment, nursing staff reported alert fatigue due to frequent soft limit warnings. This was resolved by: +
+-
+
- Refining drug library soft limits in collaboration with pharmacy +
- Providing additional training on alert interpretation +
- Customizing alerting thresholds for ICU patient population +
+ Outcome: Alert acceptance rate improved from 68% to 94% after adjustments. +
+ +Battery life
++ Battery life was slightly shorter than manufacturer specification in high-use scenarios (average 6.5 hours vs specified 7 hours). +
+-
+
- Particularly noticeable during busy shifts with continuous use +
- Required more frequent charging than anticipated +
- Supplier acknowledged the issue and provided additional battery packs +
+ Mitigation: Increased charging station availability and implemented battery rotation protocol. +
+Business case
+ +Cost analysis
+ +-
+
- + Acquisition cost per device + +
- + £9,200 (bulk purchase of 120 units) + +
- + Annual maintenance per device + +
- + £850 + +
- + Training costs (one-off) + +
- + £34,500 (including backfill) + +
- + Implementation costs + +
- + £28,000 (IT integration, project management, additional charging stations) + +
- + Total 5-year cost + +
- + £1,677,500 + +
Value and benefits
+ ++ Our business case demonstrated significant value through: +
+ +-
+
- Error reduction: Estimated £180,000 annual savings from avoided adverse drug events and associated care costs +
- Efficiency gains: 15 minutes saved per patient per day = approximately £95,000 annual staff time savings +
- Reduced documentation burden: Automatic EHR documentation saves approximately 8 minutes per infusion +
- Audit and compliance: Comprehensive audit trail reduces investigation time for incidents +
Return on investment: Estimated 24-month payback period based on error reduction and efficiency gains
+Decision factors
+ ++ Our procurement decision was based on four key factors: +
+ +1. Clinical safety
++ The 45% reduction in medication errors was the most significant factor. Patient safety improvements aligned with our Quality Improvement Programme objectives and CQC action plan requirements. +
+ +2. EHR integration capability
++ Seamless Epic integration was essential. Previous systems required manual data entry and transcription, creating additional error risks and staff burden. The SmartPump 300's HL7 FHIR compatibility met our interoperability requirements. +
+ +3. Staff training requirements
++ The intuitive interface and shorter-than-expected training time reduced implementation barriers. High staff satisfaction scores indicated strong user acceptance, which was critical for trust-wide adoption. +
+ +4. Total cost of ownership
++ While acquisition costs were higher than some alternatives, the business case demonstrated strong value through error reduction and efficiency gains. No proprietary consumables requirement kept ongoing costs manageable. +
+ + {# Implementation Lessons #} +Implementation lessons learned
+ +What worked well
+-
+
- + + Early pharmacy engagement – involving pharmacy in drug library configuration from day one prevented many potential alert fatigue issues + +
- + + Phased training approach – training "super users" first who then supported colleagues reduced training team burden + +
- + + Supplier support during go-live – having supplier engineers on-site for the first week resolved teething issues quickly + +
- + + Weekly review meetings – first 6 weeks of weekly MDT meetings allowed rapid problem-solving and adjustment + +
What we'd do differently
+-
+
- + + More charging stations upfront – we underestimated charging needs and had to order additional stations mid-trial + +
- + + Earlier Wi-Fi testing – network connectivity issues in week 1 could have been identified during pre-deployment testing + +
- + + Longer pilot period consideration – some staff felt 6 months was tight for capturing seasonal variation and edge cases + +
Recommendations for other trusts
+ ++ Based on our experience, we would recommend the SmartPump 300 to other trusts, particularly those: +
+ +-
+
- Using Epic or other HL7 FHIR-compliant EHR systems +
- Looking to reduce medication administration errors +
- Seeking to improve infusion pump fleet standardization +
- Requiring strong audit trail and compliance capabilities +
+ Important considerations for evaluation: +
+ +-
+
- Plan for 2-3 weeks of drug library optimization with your pharmacy team +
- Ensure adequate Wi-Fi coverage and bandwidth in deployment areas +
- Budget for additional charging infrastructure beyond manufacturer recommendations +
- Allow sufficient time for staff training, even though it's quicker than traditional pumps +
- Establish clear escalation paths for technical issues during go-live +
Conclusion
+ ++ The SmartPump 300 Infusion System met or exceeded expectations across all evaluation criteria. The 45% reduction in medication administration errors, combined with high staff satisfaction and seamless EHR integration, provided clear evidence of clinical value. +
+ ++ While we encountered minor challenges with alert optimization and battery management, these were successfully resolved through collaboration with the supplier and our clinical teams. The business case demonstrated strong return on investment through error reduction and efficiency gains. +
+ ++ Based on the trial outcomes, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust approved procurement and began trust-wide rollout in August 2023. We are now deploying SmartPump 300 devices across all inpatient wards and theatres, with full implementation expected by March 2024. +
+ +Overall rating: 4.5/5
+Recommendation: Would recommend to other trusts
+Report information
+ +-
+
- + Report authors + +
-
+ Sarah Mitchell (Lead Nurse)
+ Dr Aisha Patel (Clinical Director)
+ David Chen (Pharmacy Lead) +
+ - + Report date + +
- + July 2023 + +
- + Report version + +
- + 1.0 (Final) + +
- + Approved by + +
- + Trust Medical Devices Committee + +
Related resources
+ +-
+
- + Download full report (PDF) + +
- + Business case summary + +
- + Training materials used + +
- + Drug library configuration guide + +
- + Back to product page + +
Contact for peer discussion
+ + +-
+
- + Contact + +
-
+
+ Sarah Mitchell
+
+ Lead Nurse, Critical Care
+ St James's University Hospital +
+ - + + +
- + Email address + +
- + + +
- + + +
Happy to discuss
+-
+
- Implementation approach +
- Staff training and change management +
- Clinical outcomes and safety improvements +
- EHR integration experience +
- Business case development +
Evaluation details
+ +Tell us about your evaluation of SmartPump Infusion Device Pro
+ + + ++ Evaluation shared successfully +
++ SmartPump Infusion Device Pro
+ is now visible to NHS procurement professionals +
What happens next?
+ +-
+
- Other trusts can now see your evaluation when comparing products +
- You'll receive email notifications if someone contacts you with questions +
- You can update or edit this evaluation at any time from your dashboard +
+ +
Want to help even more?
+ +You have 3 other products in use at your trust that don't have shared evaluations yet:
+ +-
+
-
+ + ++
+
+
-
+ + ++
+
+
-
+ + ++
+
+ Need help? +
+If you have questions about managing your evaluations:
+ ++ Your impact +
+You've now shared 2 evaluations that are helping NHS trusts make better procurement decisions.
+Your evaluations have been viewed 47 times by other trusts.
+Supporting the NHS 10 Year Plan
+The NHS 10 Year Plan commits to making better use of data and digital technology to improve outcomes and experiences. Compass supports this vision by:
+-
+
- Enabling value-based procurement through centralised evidence +
- Reducing variation in medical technology adoption across trusts +
- Supporting clinical and financial sustainability +
- Accelerating innovation adoption where evidence supports it +
Get started with Compass
+ + {{ actionLink({ + "text": "Search for medical technologies", + "href": "search" + }) }} + +Or learn more about:
+ + + +What Compass offers
+Access multiple trusted sources in one place: NICE Medtech Guidance, ODEP Accreditation, DTAC Passporting, NHS Trust Evaluations, and MHRA Registration data.
" + }) }} +Read and share evaluations from NHS trusts using the technologies in practice, providing insights beyond formal guidance.
" + }) }} +Consistent presentation of evidence across all products makes it easier to assess and compare technologies using the same criteria and quality standards.
" + }) }} +Who the service is for
+Access evidence quickly to support tendering processes, supplier evaluation, and business case development for medical technology purchases.
" + }) }} +Review clinical evidence and real-world evaluations from other NHS trusts to inform technology adoption decisions in your service.
" + }) }} +Support your evaluation processes with centralised regulatory and clinical evidence, and share your findings with other NHS organisations.
" + }) }} +Identify evidence-based innovations and assess their readiness for adoption across your organisation or integrated care system.
" + }) }} +Trusted data sources
+ +Compass integrates evidence from the most authoritative sources in healthcare:
+ ++ + NICE Medtech Guidance +
+Evidence-based guidance on medical technologies from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
+ ++ + ODEP Accreditation +
+Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel ratings for implants and related devices.
+ ++ + DTAC Passporting +
+Devices Technical Advisory Committee approval status for medical devices.
+ ++ + NHS Trust Evaluations +
+Real-world assessments and feedback from NHS organisations using these technologies in practice.
+ ++ + MHRA Registration Data +
+Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency registration and compliance information.
+ + + +Benefits of using Compass
+ +-
+
- + Save time + +
- + Reduce hours spent gathering evidence from multiple sources. Access everything you need in one place. + +
- + Improve consistency + +
- + Use standardised evidence presentation to ensure fair comparison and reduce variation in decision-making. + +
- + Support collaboration + +
- + Share evaluations and learn from other NHS organisations' experiences with medical technologies. + +
- + Increase confidence + +
- + Make evidence-based decisions backed by multiple trusted sources and peer assessments. + +
- + Enable value-based care + +
- + Focus on clinical outcomes and evidence rather than price alone when procuring medical technologies. + +
Get started and sign up
+ + {{ actionLink({ + "text": "Search for medical technologies", + "href": "search" + }) }} + ++ or Sign up +
+What this service offers
+-
+
-
+ ++ +++ + +
Centralised evidence
+Access multiple trusted sources in one place, including NICE Medtech Guidance, ODEP Accreditation, + NHS Trust Evaluations and MHRA Registration data.
+
+ -
+ ++++
Real-world evaluations
+Read and share evaluations from NHS trusts that are using technologies in practice, and get insights beyond formal guidance.
+
+ -
+ ++++
Peer contact support
+Connect directly with trusts who have evaluated technologies you're considering. Learn + from their experience before making decisions.
+
+
Who the service is for
+Access evidence quickly to support tendering processes, supplier evaluation, and business + case development for medical technology purchases.
" + }) }} +Review clinical evidence and real-world evaluations from other NHS trusts to inform + technology adoption decisions in your service.
" + }) }} +Support your evaluation processes with centralised regulatory and clinical evidence, and + share your findings with other NHS organisations.
" + }) }} +Identify evidence-based innovations and assess their readiness for adoption across your + organisation or integrated care system.
" + }) }} +Trusted data sources
+This service integrates evidence from the most authoritative sources in healthcare:
++ + NICE Medtech Guidance +
+Evidence-based guidance on medical technologies from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence +
+ ++ + ODEP Accreditation +
+Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel ratings for implants and related devices
+ + ++ + NHS Trust Evaluations +
+Real-world assessments and feedback from NHS organisations using these technologies in practice
+ ++ + MHRA Registration Data +
+Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency registration and compliance information
+Benefits of using this service
+ +-
+
- Enhance your research +
- Get easy access to centralised evidence, resources and key contact details. +
- Improve consistency +
- Compare standardised evidence to encourage fair, consistent decision-making. +
- Support collaboration +
- Share evaluations and learn from other NHS organisations' + experiences with medical technologies. +
- Increase confidence +
- Make evidence-based decisions backed by multiple trusted sources + and peer assessments. +
- Enable value-based care +
- Focus on clinical outcomes and evidence rather than price alone + when procuring medical technologies. +
Search and evaluate medical technology based on good clinical outcomes
+ +Used by NHS trusts
+ {% endblock %} + + {% block heroActions %} ++ or sign up your trust +
+
+ Value-based procurement for medical technologies
+ {% endblock %} + + {% block heroLede %} +Search, evaluate and choose a supplier based on good clinical outcomes. Used by NHS trusts everywhere.
+ {% endblock %} + + {% block heroActions %} +Supplier catalogue
+ +Search, evaluate and choose a supplier based on good clinical outcomes.
+ + + + +Value based procurement for medical technologies
+ +Search, evaluate and choose a supplier based on good clinical outcomes.
+ +Used by NHS trusts everywhere.
+ + +
+ Value based procurement for medical technologies
+ +Search, evaluate and choose a supplier based on good clinical outcomes.
+ +Used by NHS trusts everywhere.
+ ++ or log in +
+
+ Search
+Search and compare medical technologies
+Privacy statement
+ + + + + + + + + ++ + HealVac NPWT System + +
+ ++ Advanced Woundcare Therapeutics Ltd +
+ ++ Supplier information +
+ +-
+
- + Company + +
- + Advanced Woundcare Therapeutics Ltd + +
- + Type + +
- + SME, UK manufacturer + +
- + Contact + +
-
+ sales@woundcaresolutions.co.uk
+ 0800 234 5678 +
+ - + Website + +
- + www.woundcaresolutions.co.uk + +
| Cost component | +Typical range | +
|---|---|
| Unit cost (10x10cm) | +£3.20 - £3.85 | +
| Unit cost (15x15cm) | +£5.40 - £6.20 | +
| Staff training | +£0 - £500 (one-time) | +
| Projected savings | +15-25% reduction in dressing changes | +
-
+
- Sizes: 10x10cm, 15x15cm, 20x20cm, heel, sacral +
- Absorbency: Up to 20x weight +
- Wear time: Up to 7 days +
- Sterilisation: Gamma irradiated +
- Shelf life: 5 years +
- UKCA/CE marked: Yes +
- Classification: Class IIa medical device +
+ Related resources +
+ +-
+
- + Product brochure (PDF) + + + + +
- + Safety data sheet + +
- + Training materials + +
+ +
NHS trust experience at a glance
+18 NHS trusts have experience with this product. Click any section for details.
+ + {# Outcome chart #} +Procurement decisions
+ + {# Simple donut chart using CSS #} ++ trusts +
-
+
- 13 Procured +
- 3 Under review +
- 2 Not procured +
Click for details →
+By NHS region
+ + {# Horizontal bar chart #} +Click for regional contacts →
+Willing to discuss
+ + {# Simple stat with ring #} ++ contacts +
12 of 18 trusts are happy to share lessons learned
+ +-
+
- • 5 Teaching hospitals +
- • 4 District generals +
- • 3 Community trusts +
Click to contact →
+Information shared by NHS organisations
+12 NHS organisations have shared information. The documents shared may include full clinical trials, pilot studies, business cases or quick desk reviews. Contact details are included for those willing to discuss their experience.
+ + {# Filter tabs #} ++ Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust +
+ + {# Summary list #} +-
+
- Document type +
- 12-week clinical trial +
- Document period +
- January 2024 - March 2024 +
- Ward/Department +
- Tissue Viability Service +
- Scale +
- 156 patients across 3 wards +
+ + {# Contact section #} +
Contact for peer discussion
+ +Sarah Chen
+Tissue Viability Lead Nurse
+ + +0161 276 1234
+ ++ Sarah is happy to discuss clinical outcomes, cost savings, and implementation challenges. +
+ ++ Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust +
+ + {# Summary list #} +-
+
- Document type +
- 8-week comparative study +
- Document period +
- November 2023 - January 2024 +
- Ward/Department +
- Surgical Wards +
- Scale +
- 3 products compared, 89 patients +
+ + {# Contact section #} +
Contact for peer discussion
+ +James Okonkwo
+Procurement Category Manager
+ + +020 7188 7188
+ ++ James is happy to discuss supplier experience, product comparison methodology, and procurement process. +
+ ++ University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust +
+ + {# Summary list #} +-
+
- Document type +
- 6-month pilot study +
- Document period +
- March 2023 - August 2023 +
- Ward/Department +
- Critical Care Unit +
- Scale +
- 18 pumps deployed +
+ + {# Contact section #} +
Contact for peer discussion
+ +Dr James Okonkwo
+Clinical Lead, Oncology
+ + +0121 371 2000
+ ++ James is happy to discuss chemotherapy safety, pharmacy integration, and business case development. +
+ ++ Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust +
+ + {# Summary list #} +-
+
- Document type +
- 8-week pilot +
- Document period +
- December 2024 - February 2025 +
- Ward/Department +
- Burns Unit +
- Scale +
- Trial in progress +
+ Report available after trial completion +
+ ++ + {# Contact section #} +
Contact for peer discussion
+ ++ Contact details will be available after trial completion (expected March 2025). +
+ +-
+
- disagree with something on this page +
- have a query about something on this page +
- would like to amend something on this page + +
In all instances, contact the team on 0330 2234 776 or email: enquiries@dhsc.gov.uk
+{% endset %} + ++ CardioLife AED-3100 +
+ ++ Cardiac Solutions Ltd +
+ ++ MHRA Registered + UK Made +
+ ++ Advanced automated external defibrillator with integrated CPR guidance, designed for use in both professional healthcare and community settings. +
+ +Evidence summary
+ ++ Recommended +
+MTG42 - March 2023
+ " + }) }} +Accreditation
+Level 3A
+ " + }) }} ++ Approved +
+Valid until 2025-12-31
+ " + }) }} +24
+Active evaluations
+ " + }) }} +Detailed information
+ + ++ + NICE Medtech Guidance +
+ +Recommended
+ +-
+
- + Guidance reference + +
- + MTG42 + +
- + Publication date + +
- + March 2023 + +
- + Recommendation + +
- + The case for adopting CardioLife AED-3100 for automated external defibrillation is supported by the evidence. The device shows improved outcomes in both community and healthcare settings. + +
- + Key benefits + +
-
+
-
+
- Improved survival rates compared to standard AEDs +
- Integrated CPR guidance reduces time to effective treatment +
- User-friendly interface suitable for lay responders +
- Cost-effective over device lifetime +
+
+ + ODEP Accreditation +
+ +-
+
- + Accreditation level + +
- + Level 3A + +
- + Assessment date + +
- + January 2024 + +
- + Rating explanation + +
- + Level 3A indicates this device meets the highest standards for clinical evidence and post-market surveillance data, with extensive evidence of clinical efficacy and safety. + +
+ + DTAC Passport +
+ +Approved
+ +-
+
- + Passport number + +
- + DTAC-2024-0156 + +
- + Approval date + +
- + January 2024 + +
- + Valid until + +
- + 31 December 2025 + +
- + Status + +
- + All technical and safety assessments completed and approved. Device meets NHS standards for procurement. + +
Technical specifications
+ +-
+
- + Device classification + +
- + Class IIb Medical Device + +
- + Energy output + +
- + 150-360 Joules (biphasic) + +
- + Battery life + +
- + 5 years standby / 200 shocks + +
- + Weight + +
- + 2.4 kg (including battery and pads) + +
- + Dimensions + +
- + 28 cm × 24 cm × 8 cm + +
- + IP rating + +
- + IP55 (dust and water resistant) + +
- + Operating temperature + +
- + 0°C to 50°C + +
- + Certifications + +
- + CE marked, UKCA marked, ISO 13485, IEC 60601-1 + +
- + Key features + +
-
+
-
+
- Real-time CPR feedback with metronome +
- Bilingual voice prompts (English and Welsh) +
- Automatic shock delivery option +
- Adult and paediatric modes +
- Event data recording and WiFi connectivity +
- 8-year warranty +
+
NHS Trust evaluations
+ +24 NHS organisations have submitted evaluations of this device.
+ + {{ details({ + "text": "View evaluation summary", + "HTML": " +Overall satisfaction
+4.6 / 5.0 (based on 24 evaluations)
+ +Key themes from evaluations
+-
+
- Ease of use: Consistently rated highly by clinical and non-clinical users +
- Reliability: Very low failure rate reported across trusts +
- Training: Minimal training required, intuitive interface +
- Maintenance: Low maintenance requirements, good battery life +
- Integration: Easy to integrate into existing emergency response protocols +
Recent evaluations
+ +Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust - October 2024
+\"Excellent device for both A&E and community response teams. The CPR guidance feature has improved our response times and outcomes. Highly recommend.\"
+Rating: 5/5
+Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust - September 2024
+\"Deployed across 15 sites. Staff found it very easy to use with minimal training. The WiFi connectivity for data upload is a huge benefit for audit purposes.\"
+Rating: 4.5/5
+Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - August 2024
+\"Replaced older AED models with CardioLife. Significant improvement in user confidence. Battery life exceeds specifications in our experience.\"
+Rating: 4.8/5
+Supplier information
+ +-
+
- + Manufacturer + +
- + Cardiac Solutions Ltd + +
- + Country of manufacture + +
- + United Kingdom + +
- + Company registration + +
- + Companies House No. 08765432 + +
- + NHS framework + +
- + NHS Supply Chain - Acute Care Equipment Framework + +
- + Support + +
- + 24/7 technical support, UK-based service centres + +
- + Contact + +
-
+ nhs@cardiacsolutions.co.uk
+ 0800 123 4567 +
+
This product is available through NHS Supply Chain.
+Product code: AED-CL-3100
+ + " + }) }} + +Related products
+ +MedTech Innovations
+Under Review NICE
+ " + }) }} +Advanced Medical Systems
+Recommended with Conditions NICE
+ " + }) }} +Browse our complete range of automated external defibrillators.
" + }) }} +Next steps
+ + + + + ++ SmartPump 300 Infusion System +
+ ++ MedTech Innovations Ltd +
+ ++ NHS trusts using this product +
++ 12 NHS trusts have evaluated this product +
++ Procured: 9 trusts + Under review: 2 trusts + Excluded: 1 trust +
+ ++ + View all trusts using this product + +
+Procured (9 trusts)
+-
+
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust +
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust +
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust +
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust +
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust +
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust +
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
Under review (2 trusts)
+-
+
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
Excluded (1 trust)
+-
+
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust +
+ 3 trusts have shared contact details for peer discussions +
+Product overview
++ The SmartPump 300 is an advanced infusion system designed to improve patient safety and clinical outcomes through intelligent drug delivery management. The system integrates a comprehensive drug library with dose error reduction software (DERS) and provides wireless connectivity to electronic health record systems. +
++ Key features include real-time monitoring, automated alerts for potential medication errors, and detailed audit trails for clinical governance. The device has been specifically designed to meet NHS requirements for interoperability and data standards. +
+Key features
+-
+
- Integrated drug library with over 1,200 medications +
- Dose error reduction software (DERS) with smart alerts +
- Wireless connectivity for EHR integration (HL7 FHIR compliant) +
- Real-time monitoring dashboard with automated alerts +
- Battery life: 8 hours continuous operation +
- Touch screen interface with intuitive navigation +
- Comprehensive audit trail for clinical governance +
- Compatible with standard IV administration sets +
- Barcode scanning for medication verification +
- Multi-channel configuration options (1-4 channels) +
Working with this supplier
++ Based on feedback from trusts that have procured this product: +
+ +-
+
- + Customer service rating + +
- + 4.5/5 (9 trusts responded) + +
- + Supply chain reliability + +
- + No issues reported + +
- + Training quality + +
- + Excellent - Shorter than expected training time, comprehensive materials + +
- + Technical support + +
- + Responsive - Average response time: <4 hours + +
- + Common feedback + +
- + "Very responsive to configuration issues", "Good post-sale support", "Helpful with Wi-Fi setup" + +
+ + View technical specifications + +
+-
+
- + Flow rate range + +
- + 0.1 - 999 ml/hr + +
- + Accuracy + +
- + ±5% at steady state + +
- + Pressure range + +
- + 0-1000 mmHg + +
- + Power supply + +
- + AC 100-240V, 50/60Hz; Internal rechargeable battery + +
- + Dimensions + +
- + 310mm (H) × 180mm (W) × 150mm (D) + +
- + Weight + +
- + 3.2 kg + +
- + Certifications + +
- + CE marked (MDR 2017/745), MHRA registered, ISO 13485:2016 + +
- + Connectivity + +
- + Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Bluetooth 5.0, USB 3.0 + +
+ + View clinical outcomes data + +
++ Based on evaluations across 12 NHS trusts over 18 months: +
+ +-
+
- + Medication error reduction + +
- + 42% average reduction in medication administration errors + +
- + Adverse drug events + +
- + 38% decrease in adverse drug events related to infusion therapy + +
- + Clinical time savings + +
- + Average 15 minutes per patient per day saved on medication administration + +
- + User satisfaction + +
- + 4.6/5 average satisfaction rating from nursing staff + +
- + Training time + +
- + Average 2 hours initial training required + +
Clinical trial data
++ A prospective multi-centre randomized controlled trial was conducted across 8 NHS hospitals with 2,400 patients between January 2023 and December 2023. +
+
+ Primary outcome: Reduction in medication administration errors
+ Secondary outcomes: Adverse drug events, clinical time utilization, user satisfaction
+
+ Published: British Medical Journal, March 2024
+ DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2024.0123456
+
+ + View cost analysis + +
+-
+
- + Acquisition cost + +
- + £8,500 - £12,000 (depending on configuration and volume) + +
- + Annual maintenance + +
- + £850 (includes software updates, calibration, support) + +
- + Consumables compatibility + +
- + Uses standard IV sets (no proprietary consumables required) + +
- + Expected lifespan + +
- + 8-10 years with proper maintenance + +
- + Total cost of ownership (5 years) + +
- + £12,750 - £16,250 + +
- + Estimated ROI + +
- + 18-24 months (based on error reduction and time savings) + +
+ Supplier information +
+ +-
+
- + Company + +
- + MedTech Innovations Ltd + +
- + Type + +
- + SME, UK Manufacturer + +
- + Contact + +
-
+ sales@medtechinnovations.co.uk
+ 0800 123 4567 +
+ - + Website + +
- + www.medtechinnovations.co.uk + +
+ Related resources +
+ +-
+
- + Product brochure (PDF) + +
- + Technical specifications (PDF) + +
- + User manual (PDF) + +
- + Clinical trial publication + +
- + Safety data sheet + +
- + Training materials + +
+ Compare products +
++ Add this product to your comparison list to evaluate it against alternatives. +
+ + Add to comparison + +Evaluations from NHS trusts
++ This product has been evaluated by 12 NHS trusts. These evaluations range from full clinical trials to pilot studies to quick desk reviews. Contact details are provided below for trusts who have agreed to share their experience. +
++ Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Evaluation type + +
- + 6-month clinical trial + +
- + Evaluation period + +
- + January 2023 - June 2023 + +
- + Ward/Department + +
- + Critical Care Unit, St James's University Hospital + +
- + Scale + +
- + 24 pumps deployed + +
How they evaluated
++ Full clinical trial with control group using previous infusion system. Measured error rates, staff satisfaction, and training time. Business case included cost-benefit analysis of error reduction. Decision factors: clinical safety, EHR integration capability, staff training requirements, and total cost of ownership. +
+ +Key findings
+-
+
- Reduced medication errors by 45% compared to previous system +
- Nursing staff reported improved confidence in medication administration +
- Integration with Epic EHR system was seamless +
- Training time was shorter than anticipated (average 2 hours vs 4 hours budgeted) +
Concerns identified
+-
+
- Initial alert fatigue during first 2 weeks of deployment +
- Battery life slightly shorter than manufacturer specification in high-use scenarios +
+ + View full evaluation report + +
+
+ Overall rating: 4.5/5
+ Would recommend: Yes
+ Report uploaded: July 2023
+
Contact for peer discussion
+
+ Sarah Mitchell
+ Lead Nurse, Critical Care
+
+ sarah.mitchell@nhs.net
+ 0113 243 2799
+
+ Sarah is happy to discuss implementation, staff training, and clinical outcomes +
+ + Contact Sarah + ++ University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Evaluation type + +
- + 6-month pilot study + +
- + Evaluation period + +
- + March 2023 - August 2023 + +
- + Ward/Department + +
- + Oncology Day Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital + +
- + Scale + +
- + 18 pumps deployed + +
How they evaluated
++ Pilot deployment in single oncology day unit. Focused on chemotherapy safety and drug library customization. Evaluation included feedback from nursing staff, pharmacy team, and patients. Business case emphasized error reduction and audit trail benefits. Decision factors: chemotherapy safety features, pharmacy integration, and cost per device. +
+ +Key findings
+-
+
- Significant reduction in chemotherapy dosing errors (from 8 incidents to 1 incident) +
- Drug library customization was straightforward +
- Real-time monitoring improved clinical oversight +
- Positive feedback from pharmacy team on audit trail functionality +
Concerns identified
+-
+
- Initial Wi-Fi connectivity issues (resolved after network configuration) +
- Touchscreen less responsive with gloved hands +
+ + View full evaluation report + +
+
+ Overall rating: 4.7/5
+ Would recommend: Yes
+ Report uploaded: September 2023
+
Contact for peer discussion
+
+ Dr James Okonkwo
+ Clinical Lead, Oncology
+
+ james.okonkwo@nhs.net
+ 0121 371 2000
+
+ James is happy to discuss chemotherapy safety, pharmacy integration, and business case development +
+ + Contact James + ++ Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Evaluation type + +
- + 6-month usage report + +
- + Evaluation period + +
- + February 2023 - July 2023 + +
- + Ward/Department + +
- + Cardiac Surgery Unit, St Thomas' Hospital + +
- + Scale + +
- + 30 pumps deployed + +
How they evaluated
++ Pragmatic evaluation tracking real-world usage data and staff feedback. Focused on integration with existing Cerner system and error rates. Business case built on documented error reduction from other trusts. Decision factors: EHR integration, error reduction evidence from peers, and staff feedback. +
+ +Key findings
+-
+
- 40% reduction in medication administration errors +
- Excellent integration with Cerner Millennium +
- Staff satisfaction rating of 4.6/5 +
- Reduced time spent on manual documentation +
Concerns identified
+-
+
- Learning curve for advanced features (resolved with additional training) +
- Occasional false occlusion alarms in first month +
+ + View full evaluation report + +
+
+ Overall rating: 4.4/5
+ Would recommend: Yes
+ Report uploaded: August 2023
+
Contact for peer discussion
+
+ Emma Thompson
+ Senior Sister, Cardiac Surgery
+
+ emma.thompson@nhs.net
+ 020 7188 7188
+
+ Emma is happy to discuss real-world usage, staff training, and EHR integration +
+ + Contact Emma + ++ NHS Supply Chain Technical Evaluation +
+ +-
+
- + Evaluation type + +
- + Technical assessment and procurement framework evaluation + +
- + Evaluation date + +
- + March 2023 + +
- + Framework status + +
- + Approved for NHS Supply Chain Framework + +
Assessment summary
++ Comprehensive technical evaluation covering device specifications, safety compliance, interoperability standards, and value for money. Product meets all NHS Supply Chain technical requirements and quality standards. +
+ +Key assessment criteria met
+-
+
- Full compliance with NHS Data Dictionary and HL7 FHIR standards +
- CE marking and MHRA registration verified +
- Cybersecurity assessment passed (DCB 0129 compliant) +
- Value for money assessment: competitive pricing with no proprietary consumables +
+ + View NHS Supply Chain assessment + +
+
+ Assessment completed: March 2023
+ Framework inclusion date: April 2023
+ NHS Supply Chain product code: ELB123456
+
+ Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Evaluation type + +
- + 2-week desk review and supplier meeting + +
- + Evaluation period + +
- + May 2023 + +
- + Department + +
- + Procurement, Medical Devices + +
Why excluded
++ Trust decided not to proceed because they were already mid-way through a large-scale infusion pump replacement program with a different supplier. The existing contract had 3 years remaining and standardization across all wards was a priority. Product itself was well-regarded but timing didn't align with procurement cycle. +
+ +Feedback provided
+-
+
- Product specifications met requirements +
- Pricing was competitive +
- Decision was driven by contract timing, not product concerns +
- Would consider for next procurement cycle (2026) +
+ + View evaluation notes + +
+
+ Evaluation completed: May 2023
+ Decision: Not proceeding at this time
+
+ This trust has indicated they may be interested in future procurement discussions. Contact details not published at their request. +
++ 8 additional NHS trusts have evaluated this product and provided data, but have not made detailed evaluations or contact details publicly available. Summary data from all 12 evaluations is included in the clinical outcomes section above. +
++ If you would like to discuss this product with trusts not listed above, contact the Compass team and we can help facilitate introductions where trusts have agreed to peer discussions. +
++ SmartPump 300 Infusion System +
+ ++ MedTech Innovations Ltd +
+ ++ Supplier information +
+ +-
+
- + Company + +
- + MedTech Innovations Ltd + +
- + Contact + +
-
+ sales@medtechinnovations.co.uk
+ 0800 123 4567 +
+ - + Website + +
- + www.medtechinnovations.co.uk + +
+ 12 NHS trusts have experience with this product +
++ Procured: 9 trusts + Under review: 2 trusts + Excluded: 1 trust +
+ ++ + View all trusts that have experience with this product + +
+Procured (9 trusts)
+-
+
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust +
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust +
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust +
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust +
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust +
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust +
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
Under review (2 trusts)
+-
+
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust +
Excluded (1 trust)
+-
+
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust +
+ 3 trusts have shared contact details for peer discussions +
+Working with this supplier
++ Based on feedback from trusts that have procured this product: +
+ +-
+
+
+
- + Supply chain reliability + +
- + No issues reported + +
- + Training quality + +
- + Excellent - Shorter than expected training time, comprehensive materials + +
- + Technical support + +
- + Responsive - Average response time: less than 4 hours + +
+ Related resources +
+ +-
+
- + Product brochure (PDF) + + +
- + Safety data sheet + +
- + Training materials + +
Information shared by NHS organisations
++ 12 NHS organisations have shared information about this product. Documents shared may include full clinical trials, pilot studies, business cases or quick desk reviews. Contact details are included for those willing to discuss their experience. +
++ Barts Health NHS Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Document type + +
- + Business case + +
- + Document period + +
- + January 2023 + +
- + Ward/Department + +
- + Dialysis Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital + +
Contact for peer discussion
+ +
+ Dr Tess Sawyer
+ Consultant, Nephrology
+
+ tess.sawyer@nhs.net
+ 0112 244 2795
+
+ Tess is happy to discuss implementation, staff training and clinical outcomes. +
++ National Joint Registry (NJR) +
+ +-
+
- + Document type + +
- + Outcome registry report + +
- + Document date + +
- + March 2013 - September 2025 + +
- + Scale + +
- + 900 procedures + +
Report summary
++ The report includes usage and outcomes data for primary hip implants associated with Stryker's ETS Stem across the specified date range. +
+ + ++ Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Document type + +
- + Clinical trial funded by supplier + +
- + Document period + +
- + 2019-2021 + +
- + Ward/Department + +
- + Gastroenterology Unit, Queen Alexandra Hospital + +
- + Scale + +
- + 484 patients + +
Contact for peer discussion
+ +
+ Dr Said Mohseyni
+ Consultant, Gastroenterology
+
+ said.mohseyni@nhs.net
+ 020 7122 7188
+
+ Said is happy to discuss clinical outcomes and effectiveness, and staff training. +
++ Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Document type + +
- + Clinical trial uploaded by supplier + +
- + Document period + +
- + February 2023 - May 2024 + +
- + Ward/Department + +
- + Urology department, Guy's Hospital + +
- + Scale + +
- + 50 patients + +
Contact for peer discussion
+ +
+ Dr Kerris Webb
+ Clinical Lead, Urology
+
+ kerris.webb@nhs.net
+ 020 6222 2222
+
+ Kerris is happy to discuss staff training and supplier experience. +
++ University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Document type + +
- + Evaluation + +
- + Document period + +
- + March 2023 - August 2023 + +
- + Ward/Department + +
- + Oncology Day Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital + +
+ View full evaluation (PDF) +
+ + {# Contact information integrated at bottom #} +Contact for peer discussion
+ +
+ Dr James Okonkwo
+ Consultant, Critical Care
+
+ james.okwonko@nhs.net
+ 0121 371 4652
+
+ Priya is happy to discuss clinical outcomes and implementation experience. +
++ Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust +
+ +-
+
- + Document type + +
- + Clinical trial + +
- + Document period + +
- + January 2024 - June 2024 + +
- + Ward/department + +
- + Ward 3, Northumbria Specialist Emergency Care + +
Contact for peer discussion
+ +
+ Dr Sam Cordel
+ Clinical Lead
+
+ Sam is happy to discuss evaluation methodology and the procurement process. +
+Supplier response
+ ++ We do not agree with the methodology used in this evaluation. Key aspects including baseline selection, data capture timing, and outcome definitions differ from how the device is validated in clinical and operational practice, which can materially affect results. Interested parties seeking an accurate, reproducible assessment should contact us for our independent validation protocol, raw performance data, and guidance on conducting a proper evaluation in an NHS setting. Email: john.boyd@medtechinnovations.co.uk or phone: 01214452399. +
+-
+
- disagree with something on this page +
- have a query about something on this page +
- would like to amend something on this page + +
Contact the team on 0330 2234 776 or email: enquiries@dhsc.gov.uk
+{% endset %} + +Summary
+ + + +-
+
- Document: 1 file uploaded + +
- Evaluations: 3 products + +
+ +
+ Each product will appear as a separate evaluation, linked to the same document. +
+Upload your evaluation documents
+ +Upload your existing evaluation report for SmartPump Infusion Device Pro
+ +We'll just need a few key details to help other trusts find your evaluation.
+Quick share checklist
+-
+
- + + Upload documents + +
- + + Add basic details + +
- + + Confirm and submit + +
Should take about 5 minutes
+What documents to upload?
+Upload any of these:
+-
+
- Evaluation reports +
- Clinical trial results +
- User feedback summaries +
- Safety assessments +
- Cost-benefit analyses +
+ + Want more structure? + +
+If you'd like your evaluation to be more searchable and comparable, consider using the full evaluation form instead.
+Share your evaluation
+ +Upload your existing evaluation report for {{ data['product-picker'] }}
+ + +We'll just need a few key details to help other trusts find your evaluation.
+ + + + +Review your evaluation
+ +Check the details below. This is what other NHS trusts will see.
+ +-
+
+
+
+
+
+
- + Date of evaluation + +
- + + {{ data['date-of-evaluation-day'] }} {{ data['date-of-evaluation-month'] }} {{ data['date-of-evaluation-year'] }} + + +
- + + Change date + + +
- + Product procured + +
- + {{ data['recommendation'] }} + + + +
- + + Change procurement decision + + +
Clinical context
+ +-
+
+
- + Your trust + +
- + {{ data['trust-name'] or 'Not specified' }} + +
- + +
- + Department + +
- + {{ data['department-name'] or 'Not specified' }} + +
- + + Change department + + +
- + Lead clinician + +
- + {{ data['lead-clinician'] or 'Not specified' }} + +
- + + Change lead clinician + + +
Brief summary
+ +-
+
+
+
+
Documents
+ +-
+
- + Files uploaded + +
-
+ {% if data['file-upload'] %}
+
-
+
- {{ data['file-upload'] }} +
+ - + + Change files + + +
-
+
- + Visibility + +
-
+ All NHS trusts
+ This evaluation will be visible to all NHS procurement professionals using this service. +
+ - + + Change visibility + + +
Contact details
+-
+
+
- + Contact name + +
- + {{ data['contact-name'] or 'Not specified' }} + +
- + + Change contact name + + +
Topics willing to discuss
+-
+
- + Discussion topics + +
-
+
-
+ {% if data['contact-topics'] is iterable and data['contact-topics'] is not string %}
+ {% for topic in data['contact-topics'] %}
+
- + {% if topic == 'clinical-outcomes' %}Clinical outcomes and effectiveness + {% elif topic == 'evaluation-methodology' %}Evaluation methodology + {% elif topic == 'implementation' %}Implementation and training + {% elif topic == 'integration' %}System integration + {% elif topic == 'procurement-process' %}Procurement process + {% elif topic == 'costs' %}Costs and value + {% elif topic == 'supplier-experience' %}Supplier experience + {% else %}{{ topic }} + {% endif %} + + {% endfor %} + {% else %} +
- + {% if data['contact-topics'] == 'clinical-outcomes' %}Clinical outcomes and effectiveness + {% elif data['contact-topics'] == 'evaluation-methodology' %}Evaluation methodology + {% elif data['contact-topics'] == 'implementation' %}Implementation and training + {% elif data['contact-topics'] == 'integration' %}System integration + {% elif data['contact-topics'] == 'procurement-process' %}Procurement process + {% elif data['contact-topics'] == 'costs' %}Costs and value + {% elif data['contact-topics'] == 'supplier-experience' %}Supplier experience + {% else %}{{ data['contact-topics'] }} + {% endif %} + + {% endif %} +
+ - + + Change discussion topics + + +
+ + Important: + Declaration + +
+I confirm that:
+-
+
- I'm providing up-to-date and accurate information +
- I am authorised to upload these documents on behalf of my organisation +
- I am not providing anything which is confidential, commercially sensitive or will infringe on intellectual property rights +
I understand that:
+-
+
- I am not offering any warranty or commitments around what I'm providing +
- I am not responsible for the decisions made using my information +
- I can remove information later if I change my mind +
Search results
+ + {# Search bar #} ++ Filter results +
+ + {# Product Category Filter #} +Medical technologies
++ Showing 1 to 10 of 143 products +
+ + {# Results Table #} +| Product | +Supplier | +Trusts | +Evaluations | +Outcomes | +Data | +Type | +
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SmartPump 300 Infusion System | +MedTech Innovations Ltd | +8 | +12 (trials, pilots) | +6 procured 2 reviewing | +Clinical Safety Cost Sustainability | +UK SME | +
| SafeFlow IV Administration Set | +Global Medical Supplies plc | +5 | +8 (trials, studies) | +4 procured 1 excluded | +Clinical Safety Cost | +— | +
| PortaPump Mini Ambulatory Pump | +CareTech Solutions | +3 | +5 (pilots, reports) | +2 procured 1 reviewing | +Safety Cost | +SME | +
| PreciseDose PCA System | +Pain Management Technologies | +123 | +15 (trials, cases) | +10 procured 2 reviewing | +Clinical Safety Integration | +UK | +
| MultiFlow Central Infusion Hub | +MedTech Innovations Ltd | +7 | +9 (assessments) | +5 procured 2 reviewing | +Clinical Safety Integration Sustainability | +UK SME | +
| Neonatal IV Access Kit | +Pediatric Care Systems | +4 | +6 (pilots, safety) | +3 procured 1 reviewing | +Safety Cost | +— | +
| ElastoFlow Disposable Infusion Pump | +Disposable Medical Ltd | +9 | +7 (trials) | +8 procured 1 reviewing | +Clinical Cost Sustainability | +SME | +
| VoluMetric Plus Infusion Controller | +Global Medical Supplies plc | +11 | +14 (assessments) | +9 procured 2 reviewing | +Clinical Safety Integration | +— | +
| SmartSyringe Driver Pro | +CareTech Solutions | +6 | +7 (assessments, pilots) | +4 procured 2 reviewing | +Safety Integration | +UK SME | +
| Gravity IV Administration Set Ultra | +MedSupply Direct | +2 | +3 (reports) | +2 procured | +Cost | +— | +
Search results
+ + {# Search bar #} ++ Filter results +
+ + {# Product Category Filter #} +Medical technologies
++ Showing 1 to 25 of 143 products +
+ + {# Result 1 - ENHANCED #} ++ SmartPump 300 Infusion System +
++ MedTech Innovations Ltd +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 8 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 12 documents
+
+ + Including clinical trials, pilot studies and usage reports + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 6 trusts + Under review: 2 trusts + +
+ UK manufactured + SME +
++ SafeFlow IV Administration Set +
++ Global Medical Supplies plc +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 5 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 8 documents
+
+ + Including clinical trials and comparative studies + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 4 trusts + Excluded: 1 trust + +
+ PortaPump Mini Ambulatory Pump +
++ CareTech Solutions +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 3 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 5 documents
+
+ + Including pilot studies and usage reports + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 2 trusts + Under review: 1 trust + +
+ SME +
++ PreciseDose PCA System +
++ Pain Management Technologies +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 123 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 15 documents
+
+ + Including clinical trials, business cases and comparative studies + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 10 trusts + Under review: 2 trusts + +
+ UK manufactured +
++ MultiFlow Central Infusion Hub +
++ MedTech Innovations Ltd +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 7 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 9 documents
+
+ + Including technical assessments and usage reports + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 5 trusts + Under review: 2 trusts + +
+ UK manufactured + SME +
++ Neonatal IV Access Kit +
++ Pediatric Care Systems +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 4 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 6 documents
+
+ + Including pilot studies and safety assessments + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 3 trusts + Under review: 1 trust + +
+ ElastoFlow Disposable Infusion Pump +
++ Disposable Medical Ltd +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 9 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 7 documents
+
+ + Including clinical trials and patient satisfaction studies + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 8 trusts + Under review: 1 trust + +
+ SME +
++ VoluMetric Plus Infusion Controller +
++ Global Medical Supplies plc +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 11 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 14 documents
+
+ + Including technical assessments and comparative studies + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 9 trusts + Under review: 2 trusts + +
+ SmartSyringe Driver Pro +
++ CareTech Solutions +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 6 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 7 documents
+
+ + Including technical assessments and pilot studies + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 4 trusts + Under review: 2 trusts + +
+ UK manufactured + SME +
++ Gravity IV Administration Set Ultra +
++ MedSupply Direct +
+ + +-
+
- + Category + +
- + Infusion devices + +
- + Trusts using this + +
- + 2 trusts + +
- + Shared documents + +
-
+ 3 documents
+
+ + Including usage reports + +
+ - + Procurement outcomes + +
- + Procured: 2 trusts + +
Common searches
++ Recently searched across NHS trusts similar to yours +
+ + + + + ++ + + + + + +
Browse by category
+Explore what's available and see which products other trusts use.
+ +-
+
-
+ ++++
+ Orthopaedic implants +
+Hip, knee, shoulder replacements and trauma fixation devices
+247 products · 89 trust evaluations
+
+ -
+ ++++
+ Wound care +
+Dressings, negative pressure therapy and skin substitutes
+183 products · 56 trust evaluations
+
+ -
+ ++++
+ Diabetes technology +
+Insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors and smart pens
+94 products · 112 trust evaluations
+
+ -
+ ++++
+ Diagnostic imaging +
+MRI, CT, ultrasound and X-ray equipment
+156 products · 34 trust evaluations
+
+ -
+ ++++
+ Surgical instruments +
+Robotic systems, endoscopes and single-use instruments
+312 products · 67 trust evaluations
+
+ -
+ ++++
+ View all categories +
+Browse the full catalogue by GMDN classification
+18 categories · 1,247 products
+
+
+ + + + + + +
New to medical technology procurement?
+Not sure where to start? These resources help you understand what to look for when evaluating medical technologies.
+ ++ Value-based procurement explained +
++ How to move beyond lowest-price decisions and evaluate products on outcomes, safety, integration and sustainability +
++ What makes good evidence? +
++ Learn the difference between NICE guidance, ODEP ratings, clinical trials and trust evaluations — and when each matters for your decision. +
++ Questions to ask other trusts +
++ A checklist of questions that procurement leads and clinical engineers find most useful when speaking with peers about their experience +
++
Our sources
+We aggregate evidence from trusted sources, each with different strengths:
+ +-
+
- NICE Guidance +
- Clinical and cost effectiveness +
- ODEP +
- Long-term implant performance +
- Trust evaluations +
- Real-world NHS experience +
- MHRA +
- Regulatory compliance +
Recently viewed
+-
+
- Stryker Mako SmartRobotics — viewed yesterday +
- Smith+Nephew PICO 7 — viewed 3 days ago +
- Medtronic MiniMed 780G — viewed last week +
Saved comparisons
+ + +Share your evaluation
+ +Help other NHS trusts make informed decisions by sharing your product evaluation.
+ + +{% include "includes/suppliers.html" %} +Recent evaluations at your trust
+ +Sign in to Compass
+ + + + + +You're not signed in. You must sign in to access this service.
+ + + + + + + ++ Email verified successfully +
+ +{% endset %} + +{{ notificationBanner({ + html: html, + type: "success" +}) }} + + +Sign in + {{ input({ + label: { + text: "Email address" + }, + id: "email", + name: "email", + classes: "nhsuk-input--width-10", + type: "email" + }) }} + + +{{ input({ + id: "password", + classes: "nhsuk-input--width-10", + name: "password", + type: "password", + formGroup: { + attributes: { + "data-module": "password-reveal" + } + }, + label: { + text: "Password", + classes: "govuk-label--m" + }, + value: "1234ABC!" +}) }} + + + + +{{ checkboxes({ + idPrefix: "example", + name: "example", + classes: "nhsuk-checkboxes--small", + items: [ + { + value: "remember-me", + text: "Remember me on this device" + } + ] +}) }} + +{% from "button/macro.njk" import button %} + +{{ button({ + text: "Continue", + href: "dashboard" +}) }} + + + +
Sign in
+ + {{ input({ + label: { + text: "Email address" + }, + id: "email", + name: "email", + classes: "nhsuk-input--width-10", + type: "email" + }) }} + + +{{ input({ + id: "password", + classes: "nhsuk-input--width-10", + name: "password", + type: "password", + formGroup: { + attributes: { + "data-module": "password-reveal" + } + }, + label: { + text: "Password", + classes: "govuk-label--m" + }, + value: "1234ABC!" +}) }} + + + + +{{ checkboxes({ + idPrefix: "example", + name: "example", + classes: "nhsuk-checkboxes--small", + items: [ + { + value: "remember-me", + text: "Remember me on this device" + } + ] +}) }} + +{% from "button/macro.njk" import button %} + +{{ button({ + text: "Continue", + href: "dashboard" +}) }} + + + ++ Register your NHS trust +
+ ++ Join now to share your trust's product evaluations with other NHS organisations. +
+ {# Registration Form #} + + +Confirm your trust
+ + + {% from "summary-list/macro.njk" import summaryList %} + {{ summaryList({ + classes: "nhsuk-u-margin-bottom-6", + rows: [ + { + key: { + text: "Trust name" + }, + value: { + text: data['trust-picker'] or "Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust" + } + }, + { + key: { + text: "ODS code" + }, + value: { + text: data['ods-code'] or "RWE" + } + }, + { + key: { + text: "Type" + }, + value: { + text: "NHS Trust" + } + }, + { + key: { + text: "Location" + }, + value: { + text: "Leeds, West Yorkshire" + } + } + ] + }) }} + + + +Your details
+Create your account for {{ data['trust-picker'] or "Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust" }}.
+ + + +Check your email
+ +We've sent a verification link to {{to}}
+{{ data['email'] or 'name@nhs.net' }}
+Verify your account and complete sign up to access the service.
+ + +Didn't receive the email? Resend the email
+ + + + +Register Your Company
+Join the NHS supplier passporting system
+ + + +Heading
+ + + + +What Compass offers
+Terms and conditions
+ + + + + +Wound care
+Dressings, negative pressure therapy, skin substitutes, and wound management devices.
++ 183 products from 47 suppliers · + 56 NHS trust evaluations · + 23 trusts available to contact +
+Filter results
+ + {# Product type filter #} + {% from "details/macro.njk" import details %} + {% from "checkboxes/macro.njk" import checkboxes %} + + {{ details({ + text: "Product type", + open: true, + HTML: ' +Showing 183 products
+-
+
+ {# Result 1 #}
+
-
+ + + ++++
+ PICO 7 +
+Smith+Nephew · Single-use negative pressure wound therapy
+ ++ 12 trusts procured + 2 under review · 1 excluded +
+ ++ NICE MTG43 + 8 trust evaluations + NHS Supply Chain +
+ ++ 5 trusts willing to discuss lessons learned +
+
+
+ {# Result 2 #}
+ -
+ + + ++++
+ Prevena Incision Management System +
+3M/KCI · Surgical incision management
+ ++ 9 trusts procured + 3 under review +
+ ++ Clinical trial + 6 trust evaluations +
+ ++ 4 trusts willing to discuss lessons learned +
+
+
+ {# Result 3 #}
+ -
+ + + ++++
+ Mepilex Border Flex +
+Mölnlycke · Foam dressing with Safetac technology
+ ++ 7 trusts procured + 1 under review +
+ ++ 5 trust evaluations + NHS Supply Chain +
+ ++ 3 trusts willing to discuss lessons learned +
+
+
+ {# Result 4 #}
+ -
+ + + ++++
+ Aquacel Ag+ Extra +
+ConvaTec · Antimicrobial Hydrofiber dressing
+ ++ 6 trusts procured +
+ ++ 4 trust evaluations + NHS Supply Chain +
+ ++ 2 trusts willing to discuss lessons learned +
+
+
+ {# Result 5 #}
+ -
+ + + ++++
+ SNAP Therapy System +
+3M/Acelity · Ultra-portable NPWT
+ ++ 4 trusts procured + 2 under review +
+ ++ 3 trust evaluations +
+ ++ 2 trusts willing to discuss lessons learned +
+
+
+ {# Result 6 - with exclusion #}
+ -
+ + + ++++
+ Genadyne A4 +
+Genadyne · Portable NPWT system
+ ++ 3 trusts procured + 1 under review + 1 excluded +
+ ++ 2 trust evaluations +
+ ++ 1 trust willing to discuss lessons learned +
+
+
+ {# Result 7 - no NHS data yet #}
+ -
+ + + ++++
+ NANOVA Bioactive Glass +
+NANOVA · Bioactive wound healing
+ ++ No NHS trust data yet +
+ ++ MHRA registered + Pilot study +
+ ++ No trusts available to contact yet +
+
+
+