(use upvote 👍 for attentions)
Validation Type
[ ] - Fault
[ ] - Config
[X ] - Bug
[ ] - Other
What needs to be validated
- VRF is stretched across multiple sites (has
fvSiteAssociated
with
fvRemoteId
children)
- vzAny is used as either consumer OR provider on the stretched VRF
- Contract has a service graph attached (any type - PBR is NOT required)
- No
vnsEpgDefXlate
MOs exist for the service graph's first node consumer leg
Why it needs to be validated
Traffic impact if the service graph is detached and re-attached to the contract while the fault condition is present.
Additional context
RC: CSCwn95571 added vzAny multisite validation that was previously missing
(use upvote 👍 for attentions)
Validation Type
[ ] - Fault
[ ] - Config
[X ] - Bug
[ ] - Other
What needs to be validated
fvSiteAssociated
with
fvRemoteId
children)
vnsEpgDefXlate
MOs exist for the service graph's first node consumer leg
Why it needs to be validated
Traffic impact if the service graph is detached and re-attached to the contract while the fault condition is present.
Additional context
RC: CSCwn95571 added vzAny multisite validation that was previously missing