From e9008eaa1ded331786fbcbc416793b5853766453 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: 8bitpal Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 12:27:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix synchronizer-ownership terminology in reassignment diagram Contracts are stored on validators, not synchronizers, so the sequence diagram note should describe assignment rather than implying a contract lives on a synchronizer. Signed-off-by: 8bitpal --- docs-main/overview/learn/multi-synchronizer.mdx | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs-main/overview/learn/multi-synchronizer.mdx b/docs-main/overview/learn/multi-synchronizer.mdx index acd030b93..b48973357 100644 --- a/docs-main/overview/learn/multi-synchronizer.mdx +++ b/docs-main/overview/learn/multi-synchronizer.mdx @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ sequenceDiagram S1-->>V: Confirm unassignment V->>S2: Reassign contract S2-->>V: Confirm reassignment - Note over V,S2: Contract now lives on Synchronizer B + Note over V,S2: Contract is now assigned to Synchronizer B ``` ## The Global Synchronizer