|
| 1 | +# BitNet CNN Paper — TMLR Submission |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Title**: *When Augmentation Fails: Knowledge Distillation for Ternary CNNs* |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Single-venue focus on TMLR (Transactions on Machine Learning Research) with 3-reviewer simulation system. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +--- |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Quick Start |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +```bash |
| 12 | +# Build paper |
| 13 | +cd paper/tmlr && make |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +# Regenerate tables and figures from experiments |
| 16 | +uv run python -m analysis.generate_tables |
| 17 | +uv run python -m analysis.generate_figures |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +# Review workflow (3 reviewers per round) |
| 20 | +# 1. Paste paper to Claude with persona_1_theory.md prompt |
| 21 | +# 2. Save review to reviews/tmlr/round_N/reviewer_1.md |
| 22 | +# 3. Repeat for persona_2 and persona_3 |
| 23 | +# 4. Read all 3 reviews and create implementation plan |
| 24 | +# 5. Fix issues → rebuild → next round |
| 25 | +``` |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +--- |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +## Project Structure |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +``` |
| 32 | +paper/ |
| 33 | +├── tmlr/ # The paper (self-contained) |
| 34 | +│ ├── main.tex # Main paper file |
| 35 | +│ ├── preamble.tex # LaTeX packages |
| 36 | +│ ├── macros.tex # Custom commands |
| 37 | +│ ├── bibliography.tex # References |
| 38 | +│ ├── figures/ # Generated by analysis scripts |
| 39 | +│ ├── tables/ # Generated by analysis scripts |
| 40 | +│ └── Makefile |
| 41 | +│ |
| 42 | +├── reviews/ |
| 43 | +│ └── tmlr/ |
| 44 | +│ ├── prompts/ # 3 reviewer personas |
| 45 | +│ │ ├── persona_1_theory.md # ML theory researcher |
| 46 | +│ │ ├── persona_2_expert.md # Quantization expert |
| 47 | +│ │ └── persona_3_practitioner.md # Systems/deployment |
| 48 | +│ ├── round_0/ # Ready for first 3 reviews |
| 49 | +│ │ ├── (awaiting reviewer_1.md) |
| 50 | +│ │ ├── (awaiting reviewer_2.md) |
| 51 | +│ │ └── (awaiting reviewer_3.md) |
| 52 | +│ ├── round_N/ # Future rounds (3 reviews each) |
| 53 | +│ └── archive_*/ # Old single-reviewer rounds (Feb 14, 2026) |
| 54 | +│ |
| 55 | +├── research/ # Research prompts and notes |
| 56 | +├── archive/ # Old multi-venue work (if needed) |
| 57 | +│ ├── neurips-workshop/ # 7.5/10 Accept (can resurrect) |
| 58 | +│ ├── other-venues/ # bmvc, cvpr, iclr, neurips, wacv |
| 59 | +│ └── reviewers/ # Old multi-venue review system |
| 60 | +│ |
| 61 | +├── venues.md # Deadline tracker & strategy |
| 62 | +├── notes.md # Research notes and experiment log |
| 63 | +└── README.md # This file |
| 64 | +``` |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +--- |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +## Current Status |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +**Target Venue:** TMLR (rolling deadline, submit ~March 2026) |
| 71 | +**Review Status:** Ready for Round 0 (3-reviewer system) |
| 72 | +**Paper Length:** 18 pages (no page limit for TMLR) |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +### Key Results |
| 75 | +- 3-9% accuracy gap between ternary and FP32 on CIFAR |
| 76 | +- Augmentation widens gap: FP32 benefits 1.5-3.7× more |
| 77 | +- conv1 accounts for 54-74% of gap (only 0.08% params) |
| 78 | +- Recipe (FP32 conv1 + KD): 89% recovery on CIFAR-10, exceeds FP32 on harder tasks |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +--- |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +## Review Workflow (Simplified) |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +### 3-Reviewer System |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +Each round uses **3 personas** to simulate diverse reviewer feedback: |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +1. **ML Theory Researcher** - Statistical rigor, theoretical grounding |
| 89 | +2. **Quantization Expert** - Field knowledge, baseline comparisons |
| 90 | +3. **Systems Practitioner** - Reproducibility, deployment practicality |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +### Per-Round Process |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +```bash |
| 95 | +# Round N workflow |
| 96 | +cd paper/tmlr && make |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +# Get 3 independent reviews: |
| 99 | +# - Paste paper + persona_1 prompt to Claude → save to round_N/reviewer_1.md |
| 100 | +# - Paste paper + persona_2 prompt to Claude → save to round_N/reviewer_2.md |
| 101 | +# - Paste paper + persona_3 prompt to Claude → save to round_N/reviewer_3.md |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +# Read all 3 reviews |
| 104 | +cat reviews/tmlr/round_N/*.md |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +# Create implementation plan (in PLAN.md or similar) |
| 107 | +# - Synthesize MAJOR/MINOR issues across all 3 reviews |
| 108 | +# - Prioritize: fix MAJOR issues first, MINOR if time permits |
| 109 | +# - Document decisions |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +# Fix issues in main.tex |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +# Rebuild and repeat |
| 114 | +make clean && make |
| 115 | +``` |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +--- |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +## Analysis Pipeline |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +When experiments change: |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +```bash |
| 124 | +# From project root |
| 125 | +uv run python -m analysis.aggregate_results # results/raw/ → results/processed/ |
| 126 | +uv run python -m analysis.generate_tables # → paper/tmlr/tables/ |
| 127 | +uv run python -m analysis.generate_figures # → paper/tmlr/figures/ |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +# Rebuild paper |
| 130 | +cd paper/tmlr && make |
| 131 | +``` |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +**Important:** Analysis scripts now write directly to `paper/tmlr/` (updated Feb 14, 2026). |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +--- |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +## Venue Strategy |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +See [venues.md](venues.md) for full details. |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +**Primary:** TMLR (rolling, ~70% acceptance probability with current work) |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +**Backup Options:** |
| 144 | +- NeurIPS Workshop (Aug 2026) - draft at 7.5/10 Accept available in archive |
| 145 | +- BMVC, WACV (if TMLR requests major revisions) |
| 146 | +- Top venues (ICLR, NeurIPS, CVPR) require ImageNet validation |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +**Archived Work:** |
| 149 | +- NeurIPS Workshop paper (7.5/10 Accept, 5 pages) in `archive/neurips-workshop/` |
| 150 | +- Other venue drafts in `archive/other-venues/` |
| 151 | +- Multi-venue review automation in `archive/reviewers/` |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +--- |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +## Tips |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +### Building the Paper |
| 158 | +```bash |
| 159 | +cd paper/tmlr |
| 160 | +make # Build PDF |
| 161 | +make clean # Remove build artifacts |
| 162 | +``` |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +### Common Issues |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +**"No rule to make target"** |
| 167 | +- Check that preamble.tex, macros.tex, bibliography.tex exist in `tmlr/` |
| 168 | +- Ensure figures/ and tables/ directories exist in `tmlr/` |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +**"File not found" in LaTeX** |
| 171 | +- Verify `\input{}` statements use local paths (no `../`) |
| 172 | +- Check `\graphicspath{{figures/}}` points to local directory |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +**Stale tables/figures** |
| 175 | +- Re-run analysis scripts after new experiments |
| 176 | +- Check that scripts write to `paper/tmlr/tables/` and `paper/tmlr/figures/` |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +--- |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +## Key Files |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +| File | Purpose | |
| 183 | +|------|---------| |
| 184 | +| `tmlr/main.tex` | Main paper (18 pages) | |
| 185 | +| `reviews/tmlr/prompts/` | 3 reviewer personas for simulation | |
| 186 | +| `venues.md` | Venue deadlines and strategy | |
| 187 | +| `notes.md` | Detailed experiment log | |
| 188 | +| `research/` | Deep research prompts | |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +--- |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | +## Next Steps |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +1. **Expand reviewer prompts** - Add full TMLR review instructions to 3 personas |
| 195 | +2. **Run Round 2** - Get 3 reviews, synthesize feedback, fix issues |
| 196 | +3. **Final polish** - Proofread, formatting, consistency check |
| 197 | +4. **Submit to TMLR** - Target early March 2026 |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +--- |
| 200 | + |
| 201 | +## Archive |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +Multi-venue work (7 venues, automated sync, workflow automation) archived in `archive/`: |
| 204 | +- Kept neurips-workshop (7.5/10 Accept) as backup |
| 205 | +- Can resurrect other venues if needed |
| 206 | +- Focused on TMLR as primary target |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +**Rationale:** Single-venue focus reduces complexity, allows deeper iteration on one paper rather than spreading effort across 7 venues. |
0 commit comments