We compare AnomaVision against Anomalib using (PaDiM baseline) on MVTec AD and Visa datasets.
Metrics: Image AUROC, Pixel AUROC, FPS, Model Size, and Memory Usage.
| Metric (avg) | AnomaVision (Ours) | Anomalib (Baseline) |
|---|---|---|
| Image AUROC β | 0.8499 | 0.8102 |
| Pixel AUROC β | 0.9562 | 0.9354 |
| FPS β | 43.41 | 13.03 |
| Size (MB) β | 30.5 | 40.5 |
| Memory (MB) β | 1647 | 1696 |
β AnomaVision is +4% higher Image AUROC, +2% higher Pixel AUROC, and 3Γ faster.
| Class | AnomaVision Image AUROC | Anomalib Image AUROC | AnomaVision Pixel AUROC | Anomalib Pixel AUROC | AnomaVision FPS | Anomalib FPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bottle | 0.997 | 0.996 | 0.984 | 0.987 | 42.17 | 13.42 |
| cable | 0.772 | 0.742 | 0.936 | 0.935 | 36.09 | 12.82 |
| capsule | 0.839 | 0.846 | 0.929 | 0.977 | 40.21 | 8.86 |
| carpet | 0.908 | 0.594 | 0.971 | 0.987 | 43.95 | 8.26 |
| grid | 0.881 | 0.832 | 0.964 | 0.965 | 41.26 | 11.85 |
| hazelnut | 0.984 | 0.949 | 0.978 | 0.974 | 28.99 | 13.01 |
| leather | 0.985 | 0.879 | 0.985 | 0.982 | 48.69 | 14.05 |
| metal_nut | 0.940 | 0.878 | 0.963 | 0.963 | 41.43 | 13.35 |
| pill | 0.793 | 0.773 | 0.957 | 0.964 | 45.44 | 14.01 |
| screw | 0.941 | 0.787 | 0.970 | 0.982 | 42.41 | 12.40 |
| tile | 0.851 | 0.876 | 0.969 | 0.971 | 45.97 | 15.06 |
| toothbrush | 0.978 | 0.883 | 0.993 | 0.989 | 44.82 | 14.15 |
| transistor | 0.800 | 0.853 | 0.968 | 0.962 | 42.21 | 12.21 |
| wood | 0.986 | 0.915 | 0.973 | 0.975 | 45.34 | 13.40 |
| zipper | 0.914 | 0.979 | 0.972 | 0.971 | 41.04 | 12.81 |
| Metric (avg) | AnomaVision (Ours) | Anomalib (Baseline) |
|---|---|---|
| Image AUROC β | 0.8123 | 0.7825 |
| Pixel AUROC β | 0.9618 | 0.9542 |
| FPS β | 44.76 | 13.52 |
| Size (MB) β | 30.5 | 40.5 |
| Memory (MB) β | 2638 | 2796 |
β On Visa, AnomaVision is +3% better on Image AUROC, +0.7% on Pixel AUROC, and 3.3Γ faster.
| Class | AnomaVision Image AUROC | Anomalib Image AUROC | AnomaVision Pixel AUROC | Anomalib Pixel AUROC | AnomaVision FPS | Anomalib FPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| candle | 0.866 | 0.868 | 0.973 | 0.977 | 40.25 | 13.48 |
| capsules | 0.654 | 0.595 | 0.916 | 0.920 | 43.29 | 14.52 |
| cashew | 0.886 | 0.889 | 0.959 | 0.960 | 46.17 | 14.51 |
| chewinggum | 0.970 | 0.971 | 0.993 | 0.990 | 45.42 | 13.36 |
| fryum | 0.836 | 0.803 | 0.967 | 0.967 | 43.89 | 13.83 |
| macaroni1 | 0.803 | 0.767 | 0.948 | 0.949 | 43.81 | 13.46 |
| macaroni2 | 0.574 | 0.640 | 0.942 | 0.942 | 39.62 | 13.84 |
| pcb1 | 0.909 | 0.872 | 0.981 | 0.978 | 45.38 | 13.62 |
| pcb2 | 0.789 | 0.774 | 0.975 | 0.970 | 46.76 | 13.72 |
| pcb3 | 0.691 | 0.573 | 0.971 | 0.963 | 41.47 | 13.57 |
| pcb4 | 0.925 | 0.880 | 0.991 | 0.984 | 44.38 | 13.06 |
| pipe_fryum | 0.834 | 0.782 | 0.982 | 0.970 | 44.38 | 13.63 |
- 3Γ faster inference across both datasets
- Smaller model size (30 MB vs 40 MB)
- Lower memory usage
- Consistent AUROC improvements on most classes
π Benchmarks confirm: AnomaVision is edge-ready, lightweight, and faster β without sacrificing accuracy.

