Order of meta data upload form for 7A

[esfyee]

To help with the logical flow of filling out the webform, the following sections for 7A should be organized as follows:

USER
did
cycle
pi
btr
beamline
beamline_funding_partner

EXPERIMENT
detectors
sample_det_dist
staff_scientist
experimenter
technique

SAMPLE
sample_name
molecule_type
Concentration
additional_components
buffer
temperature

Thank you much!

[vkuznet]

@esfyee , Estella I implemeted required changes to support user-specific order of schema and attribues. They are propagated to foxden-dev. Please have a look.

Meanwhile, here is configuration section I've added to FOXDEN based on your example:

BeamlineSections:
  - schema: 7A
    sections:
      - section: User
        attributes:
          - did
          - cycle
          - pi
          - btr
          - beamline
          - beamline_funding_partner
      - section: Experiment
        attributes:
          - detectors
          - sample_det_dist
          - staff_scientist
          - experimenter
          - technique

Please note, that the order follows this configuration, i.e. if attribute or section is not explicitly provided but presented in schema then alphabetical order is applied. Therefore, if you are not fully satisfied with the rest of elements placements we only need to adjust FOXDEN configuration based on your input.

[esfyee]

Thanks, Valentin! I intended for the order on the webform to follow that of the schema. Now it seems the data location and beam sections are out of place. Apologies for not being clear.

[vkuznet]

ahh, ok, now I applied the order from schema, could you please have a look and confirm it.

[esfyee]

Looks great! Thanks

[vkuznet]

@esfyee , Estella please check again the foxden-dev as I modified code base to support different use-cases, your schema follow ordered pattern while other beamline may not. I think I made everything right but second pair of eyes will be useful to double check the web UI layout. Once you confirm again I'll cut new release and put these changes to production server.

[esfyee]

@vkuznet Looks good to me!