Hi, I ordered a PCBA with C7859 (TI SN74LVC4245APWR), and JLC responded that the part's package doesn't fit.
And that's correct, actually it looks like in your lib it's the package of another variant of the chip (we have TSSOP, TI package name "PW", and I think the footprint might be from SSOP, TI code "DB").
The footprint is a lot wider than it should be.
The 3D model is also incorrect.
Not sure if JLC had this issue and fixed it in the meantime, however the current EasyEDA model they have now seems to be correct.
Hi, I ordered a PCBA with C7859 (TI SN74LVC4245APWR), and JLC responded that the part's package doesn't fit.
And that's correct, actually it looks like in your lib it's the package of another variant of the chip (we have TSSOP, TI package name "PW", and I think the footprint might be from SSOP, TI code "DB").
The footprint is a lot wider than it should be.
The 3D model is also incorrect.
Not sure if JLC had this issue and fixed it in the meantime, however the current EasyEDA model they have now seems to be correct.